Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

A

1.2 Site code

DE4933420

1.3 Site name

Ackerhügelland nördlich Weimar mit Ettersberg

1.4 First Compilation date

2007-03

1.5 Update date

2018-05

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Thüringer Landesanstalt für Umwelt und Geologie (TLUG), Abt. 3
Address:               
Email:Poststelle@TLUG.Thueringen.de

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site classified as SPA:2007-05
National legal reference of SPA designation2008.07; § 33 BNatSchG i.V.m. ThürNEzVO

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:11.309700
Latitude:51.027800

2.2 Area [ha]

18703.0000

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
DEG0Thüringen

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
BA229Alcedo atthis    10     
BA056Anas clypeata    10       
BA705Anas platyrhynchos    101  250       
BA257Anthus pratensis    10     
BA222Asio flammeus       
BA059Aythya ferina       
BA059Aythya ferina    11  50       
BA061Aythya fuligula    11  50       
BA061Aythya fuligula    10     
BA215Bubo bubo       
BA726Charadrius dubius    10       
BA667Ciconia ciconia    11  50     
BA030Ciconia nigra       
BA081Circus aeruginosus    11  50     
BA082Circus cyaneus         
BA084Circus pygargus       
BA122Crex crex       
BA036Cygnus olor    11  50       
BA238Dendrocopos medius    11  50     
BA236Dryocopus martius    11  50     
BA027Egretta alba       
BA139Eudromias morinellus    10     
BA098Falco columbarius       
BA099Falco subbuteo       
BA320Ficedula parva       
BA723Fulica atra    10     
BA721Gallinula chloropus     
BA639Grus grus    51  100       
BA233Jynx torquilla       
BA338Lanius collurio    51  100     
BA653Lanius excubitor       
BA291Locustella fluviatilis     
BA246Lullula arborea       
BA383Miliaria calandra    11  50     
BA073Milvus migrans    11  50     
BA074Milvus milvus    11  50     
BA260Motacilla flava [p.p.; M. flava]       
BA072Pernis apivorus       
BA683Phalacrocorax carbo    51  100     
BA151Philomachus pugnax       
BA234Picus canus    10     
BA691Podiceps cristatus    11  50       
BA691Podiceps cristatus    10     
BA275Saxicola rubetra    11  50     
BA155Scolopax rusticola       
BA307Sylvia nisoria    10     
BA690Tachybaptus ruficollis    10       
BA690Tachybaptus ruficollis       
BA165Tringa ochropus         
BA142Vanellus vanellus    101  250       
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
A644Perdix perdix    11  50               
A213Tyto alba               
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N061.00
N081.00
N090.00
N103.00
N147.00
N1577.00
N167.00
N171.00
N191.00
N200.00
N211.00
N231.00

Total Habitat Cover

100

Other Site Characteristics

Teil des Innerthüringer Ackerhügellandes mit Ilmaue, kleineren Flachwasserspeichern und bewaldetem Muschelkalk-Höhenrücken (ehem. TÜP) mit inselartigen Feuchtbiotopen (Erdfälle und Tümpel) und ausgedehntem Kalk-Halbtrockenrasen am Südhang

4.2 Quality and importance

Das Laubmischwaldgebiet Ettersberg bildet im Zusammenhang mit locker bebuschten Halbtrockenrasen, dem abwechslungsreichen Ackerhügelland, Feldgehölzen sowie Fließ- und Standgewässern ein bedeutendes Refugium für Vogelarten wie dem Rotmilan.

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
MA04i

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type[%]
PublicNational/Federal0
State/Province5
Local/Municipal1
Any Public0
Joint or Co-Ownership0
Private3
Unknown0
sum9

4.5 Documentation

CIR-Luftbildinterpretation 1993-1995, Waldbiotopkartierung 1993-2005, Artenerfassungsprogramm (AEP): Datenbank der TLUG Jena Stand 02/2007 AKT (Avifaunistische Kommission Thüringen) (2003), Ornithologische Besonderheiten in Thüringen 2002, Mitteilungen u. Inform. Verein Thür. Ornith. e. V., 24, 1-29 AKT (Avifaunistische Kommission Thüringen) (2005), Ornithologische Besonderheiten in Thüringen 2004, Mitteilungen u. Inform. Verein Thür. Ornith. e. V., 27, 1-30 AKT (Avifaunistische Kommission Thüringen) (2006), Ornithologische Besonderheiten in Thüringen 2005, Mitteilungen u. Inform. Verein Thür. Ornith. e. V., 28, 1-36 Arenhövel, C. (1997), Das Naturschutzgebiet 'Prinzenschneise', Weimarer Heimat, H. 11, 20-22 Arenhövel, C. (1998a), Südhang des Ettersberges ist jetzt Naturschutzgebiet, Weimarer Heimat, H. 12, 65 Arenhövel, C. (1998b), Neue Schutzgebiete im Weimarer Stadtgebiet, Weimarer Heimat , H. 12, 65-67 Jansen, S. (2001), Verbreitung und Habitatwahl der Grauammer (Miliaria calandra L.) in Thüringen, Landschaftspflege u. Naturschutz Thür., 38 (1), 17-23 Kämpfe, S. (1994), Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum Beitrag 'Der Südhang des Ettersberges - Ein Naturschutzgebiet besonderer Prägung' (Folge 4/1992), Weimarer Heimat, H. 8, S. 87 Pfeiffer, T. (2001), Ergebnisse der Bestandserfassung des Rotmilans Milvus milvus im Jahr 2000 in Thüringen, Anz. Ver. Thüring. Ornithol., 4, 129-137 Pfeiffer, T. (2005), Jahresbericht der Fachgruppe Ornithologie Weimar, Unveröff. Mskr., Archiv TLUG Jena Rost F. (1998), Der Brutbestand der Lappentaucher 1997 in Thüringen, Anz. Ver. Thür. Ornithol., 3, 103-116 Rost, F. (1995), Der Brutbestand von Bläßhun (Fulica atra) und Teichhuhn (Gallinula chloropus) in Thüringen 1994, Anz. Ver. Thür. Ornithol., 2, 145-157 Rost, F. (1999), Der Brutbestand der Gänse (Anser, Branta) und der Enten (Anatidae) 1998 in Thüringen, Anz. Ver. Thür. Ornithol., 3, 185-201 Stremke, A., & Y. Petersdorff (1992), Der Südhang des Ettersberges - Ein Naturschutzgebiet besonderer Prägung, Weimarer Heimat, H. 4, 6-14 TLUG (Thüringer Landesanstalt für Umwelt und Geologie) (2007), Arten-Erfassungsprogramm (AEP), Stand 02/2007, LINFOS THKART, Jena Wiesner, J., J. Auerswald, R. Hiller, A. Kurz, R. Krause & K. Lieder (2004), Ergebnisse der thüringenweiten Kormoran-Schlafplatzzählungen in zwei Winterhalbjahren - Vortrag auf der 14. Jahrestagung des Vereins Thüringer Ornithologen, 03.04.2004 in Steinach, Unveröff. Mskr., Archiv TLUG Jena

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code Cover [%]
DE022.76

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites:

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code Site name Type Cover [%]
DE02Prinzenschneise+0.47
DE02Südhang Ettersberg+2.19
DE02Rautenschlag+0.10

Designated at international level:

Type Site name Type Cover [%]
Other Prinzenschneise+0.47
Südhang Ettersberg+2.19
Rautenschlag+0.10

5.3 Site designation (optional)

Eigentumsverhältnisse nur für Waldgebiete erhoben (Quelle: TLWJF 2007)

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Thüringen: AÖR Anstalt öffentlichen Rechts (AÖR)
Address:
Email:
Organisation:Thüringen: LK Sömmerda LK Sömmerda
Address:
Email:
Organisation:Thüringen: LK Weimarer Land LK Weimarer Land
Address:
Email:
Organisation:Thüringen: LWA Sömmerda LWA Sömmerda
Address:
Email:
Organisation:Thüringen: Stadt Erfurt Stadt Erfurt
Address:
Email:
Organisation:Thüringen: Stadt Weimar Stadt Weimar
Address:
Email:
Organisation:Thüringer Landesverwaltungsamt Obere Naturschutzbehörde
Address:
Email:

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

Sicherung eines dauerhaft günstigen Erhaltungszustandes der signifikanten Vorkommen von Vogelarten von gemeinschaftlichem Interesse im Gebiet

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY