Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

A

1.2 Site code

DE5611401

1.3 Site name

Lahnhänge

1.4 First Compilation date

2003-09

1.5 Update date

2015-05

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht Rheinland-Pfalz
Address:               
Email:

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site classified as SPA:2004-01
National legal reference of SPA designation2004.10; Drittes Landesgesetz zur Änderung des Landespflegegesetzes vom 12. Mai 2004 (GVBl. Nr. 9 vom 24.05.2004 S. 275)

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:7.672500
Latitude:50.333100

2.2 Area [ha]

1500.0000

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
DEB1Koblenz
DEB1Koblenz
DEB1Koblenz

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
BA104Bonasa bonasia         
BA215Bubo bubo       
BA236Dryocopus martius       
BA338Lanius collurio         
BA073Milvus migrans       
BA074Milvus milvus       
BA072Pernis apivorus       
BA238Picoides medius    10  10       
BA234Picus canus       
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N060.00
N082.00
N1010.00
N152.00
N1683.00
N221.00
N233.00

Total Habitat Cover

101

Other Site Characteristics

Hangwälder an der Lahn mit ausgedehnten, aus Niederwäldern hervorgegangenen Laubwaldbeständen, insbesondere Eichen.

4.2 Quality and importance

Wertgebende Arten sind Haselhuhn und Mittelspecht.

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
LD01.01i
LD01.02i
LF03.01i
LG01.02i
LG04.01b
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.5 Documentation

Biotopkartierung Rheinland-Pfalz: 56114002, 56114007, 56114008, 56114009, 56114010, 56114011, 56114012, 56114015, 56114016, 56114017, 56114027, 56114033, 56114035, 56114036, 56114041, 56114042, 56114043, 56114044, 56114045, 56114501 etc. Bammerlin, R., Braun, M., Froehlich, C., Jönck, M. (1990), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1989 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 1, 4-123, Landau Bammerlin, R.,Braun, M.,Buchmann,M., Eislöffel,F.,Jönck,M.,Kunz, A. (1993), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1992 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora Rh.-Pf., Heft 10, 5-123, Landau Bosselmann, J. et al. (2000), Die Vogelwelt in Rheinland-Pfalz (Watvögel, Möwen, Seeschwalben, Tauben, Eulen, Spechte), Pflanzen und Tiere in Rheinland-Pfalz Sonderheft, V, 184 S. Braun, M., Braun, U. (1998), Greifvögel und Eulen im Naturpark Nassau, 32 S., Bad Ems Buchmann, M., Eislöffel, F., Jönck, M. (1991), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1990 für den Reg. Bez. Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz, Heft 2 Dietrich, M., Eislöffel, F., Kunz, A. (1996), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1995 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 20, 7-126, Landau Dietzen, C., Schmidt, V. (2002), Ornithologischer Sammelbericht 2001 für Rheinland-Pfalz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 28, 7-196, Landau Eislöffel, F. (2001), Ergebnisse der landesweiten Rotmilanerfassung (Milvus milvus) 2000 in Rheinland-Pfalz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz, 9 (3), 881-887, Landau Froehlich, C., Jönck, M., Kunz, A. (1992), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1991 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 5, 5-113, Landau GNOR (2000/2001), Datenbank Vögel Isselbächer, K., Braun, M., Jönck, M. (1998), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1997 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 23, 7-121, Landau Isselbächer, K., Isselbächer, T. (2001), Vogelschutz und Windenergie in Rheinland-Pfalz, Materialien Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, 2/2001, 183 S., Oppenheim Isselbächer, T., Hoffmann, I., Magiros, C. (1997), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1996 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 22, 7-100, Landau Jönck, M., Bammerlin,R., Braun,M., Buchmann,M., Lippok,E., Renker,C. (1994), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1993 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 11, 7-118, Landau Ministerium für Umwelt Rheinland-Pfalz, LfUG Rheinland-Pfalz (Hrsg.) (1993), Planung Vernetzter Biotopsysteme, Bereich Landkreis Rhein-Lahn, 205 S., Mainz/Oppenheim Müllen, T., Bammerlin, R., Lippok, E. (1999), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1998 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 25, 7-122, Landau Müllen, T., Hof, C., Jönck, M. (2002), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht für den ehemaligen Regierungsbezirk Koblenz 1999 und 2000, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 27, Landau Rösner, S., Dietzen, C., Lippok, E. (1995), Ornithologischer Jahresbericht 1994 für den Regierungsbezirk Koblenz, Fauna und Flora in Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft, 15, 7-104, Landau Schmidt, R. (1986), Untersuchungen zum Artenschutzprojekt Haselhuhn (Bonasa bonasia) für den rechtsrheinischen Teil von Rheinland-Pfalz und den Forstamtsbezirk Ahrweiler, Naturschutz und Ornithologie in Rheinland-Pfalz, 4 (2), 221-351, Landau Schmidt, R., Schmidt-Fasel, S. (1984), Verbreitung und Schutz des Haselhuhns (Bonasa bonasia) in Rheinland-Pfalz, Naturschutz und Ornithologie in Rheinland-Pfalz, 3 (3), 408-437, Landau

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code Cover [%]
DE021.39
DE0563.27

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites:

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code Site name Type Cover [%]
DE05Nassau*63.27
DE02Ruppertsklamm+1.00
DE02Tongrube auf Escherfeld+0.39

Designated at international level:

Type Site name Type Cover [%]
Other Nassau*63.27
Ruppertsklamm+1.00
Tongrube auf Escherfeld+0.39

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:SGD Nord Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Nord Obere Naturschutzbehörde
Address:
Email:

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

§ 25 Landesnaturschutzgesetz vom 28. September 2005 (GVBl 2005, S. 387 f.), Landesverordnung über die Erhaltungsziele

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY