Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

DE6610301

1.3 Site name

Closenbruch

1.4 First Compilation date

1998-09

1.5 Update date

2016-05

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Ref. D/6 Zentrum für Biodokumentation (ZfB)
Address:               
Email:info.biodoku@umwelt.saarland.de
Date site proposed as SCI:1998-03
Date site confirmed as SCI:2004-12
Date site designated as SAC:2015-11
National legal reference of SAC designation:Verordnung über das Naturschutzgebiet 'Closenbruch' (N 6610-301) vom 2. November 2015, veröffentlicht im Amtsblatt des Saarlandes am 12. November 2015.

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:7.359400
Latitude:49.334700

2.2 Area [ha]

82.0000

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
DEC0Saarland

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
2330  info      1.4  0.00 
6230  info      1.87  0.00 
6430  info      1.05  0.00 
6510  info      31.62  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
BA257Anthus pratensis       
BA153Gallinago gallinago       
BA338Lanius collurio     
I1060Lycaena dispar       
I1061Maculinea nausithous       
BA275Saxicola rubetra       
BA276Saxicola torquata       
BA142Vanellus vanellus       
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
Agonum viridicupreum             
Amara tibialis             
1202Bufo calamita             
Carex brizoides               
Carex vesicaria               
Carex vulpina               
Corynephorus canescens               
Dianthus deltoides               
Gryllus campestris               
Harpalus autumnalis             
1261Lacerta agilis                 
1989Natrix natrix             
Omocestus haemorrhoidalis             
1209Rana dalmatina             
Riccia fluitans               
Sanguisorba officinalis               
Zygaena trifolii                 
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N0735.00
N095.00
N1042.00
N1618.00

Total Habitat Cover

100

Other Site Characteristics

Komplexes Grünlandgebiet nahe Homburg. Der größte Teil des Geb. besteht aus Nasswiesen, Röhrichten und Großseggenriedern. Es sind aber auch magere Glatthaferwiesen und Silbergrasfluren vorhanden.

4.2 Quality and importance

Reich strukturiertes Grünlandgebiet mit schutzwürdigen feuchten Hochstaudenfluren, sowie mageren Glatthaferwiesen (FFH-Lebensraum), Desw. Röhrichte, Seggenrieder, Nasswiesen, hohe Bedeutung für die Avifauna

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
LA08o
LB01.02i
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.5 Documentation

Biotopkartierung Saarland II Nr.: 66100006, Atlas DORDA, OBS-Kartierung, Sauer et al. (1987): Gutachten zur Ermittlung der Schutzwürdigkeit des Gebietes 'Closenbruch Homburg' Flottmann, Hans-Jörg, Flottmann-Stoll-Anne & Bernd, Christoph (2005) (2005), NATURA 2000 - Herpetofauna Saarland. Grunderfassung 2005 Ergebnisbericht. - unveröff. Gutachten im Auftrag des LUA

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code Cover [%]
DE02100.00

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites:

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code Site name Type Cover [%]
DE02Closenbruch=100.00

Designated at international level:

Type Site name Type Cover [%]
Other Closenbruch=100.00

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Saarland: Landesamt Landesamt für Umwelt- und Arbeitsschutz (LUA) Fachbereich Naturschutz
Address:
Email:

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

X
Yes Name: Sauer, Lösch, Maas (1987): Gutachten zur Ermittlung der Schutzwürdigkeit des Gebietes 'Closenbruch Homburg'. i.A. der Kreisstadt Homburg
Link:

No, but in preparation
No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

keine Weitere Entwässerung, Bachrenaturierung, Biotopspezifische Nutzung u. Pflege

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY