Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

NL3000401

1.3 Site name

Kampina & Oisterwijkse Vennen

1.4 First Compilation date

1998-10

1.5 Update date

2013-09

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality - Department Nature & Biodiversity
Address:               
Email:
Date site proposed as SCI:1998-07
Date site confirmed as SCI:2004-12
Date site designated as SAC:2013-05
National legal reference of SAC designation:http://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/natura2000/documenten/gebieden/133/N2K133_DB%20HV%20Kampina%20&%20Oisterwijkse%20Vennen.pdf
Explanation(s):Formerly known as SCI NL3000401 Kampina en Oisterwijkse Vennen en Bossen

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:5.245800
Latitude:51.570300

2.2 Area [ha]

2278.0000

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
NL41Noord-Brabant
NL41Noord-Brabant

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Atlantic (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
2310  info      18  0.00 
2330  info      0.2  0.00 
3110  info      0.00 
3130  info      23  0.00 
3160  info      47  0.00 
4010  info      122  0.00 
4030  info      154  0.00 
6410  info      2.2  0.00 
7110  info      0.1  0.00 
7150  info      23  0.00 
7210  info      1.4  0.00 
9120  info      8.6  0.00 
9190  info      0.9  0.00 
91D0  info      3.7  0.00 
91E0  info      3.3  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
F1149Cobitis taenia     
F1163Cottus gobio     
I1082Graphoderus bilineatus     
I1042Leucorrhinia pectoralis    51  250     
P1831Luronium natans     
A1166Triturus cristatus     
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N0610.00
N071.00
N0820.00
N1010.00
N167.00
N1740.00
N1912.00

Total Habitat Cover

100

Other Site Characteristics

Wet heathlands with pools and planted forests:

4.2 Quality and importance

One of the three most important sites for the habitat type Northern Atlantic wet heaths with Erica tetralix (4010; subtype Ericion tetralicis). The site holds one of the four examples of habitat type 3110 in the Netherlands. One of the five most important sites for Luronium natans. Important for several threathened plant and butterfly species.

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
MG01i
HK02.01i
MI01i
HH01.05b
HH04.02b
HJ02.07o
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
MUb

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.5 Documentation

Arts, G.H.P. & R.F.M. Buskens (1989). Aanvoer van venvreemd water: een noodzaak In: Roelofs, J.G.M. (red). Aanvoer van gebiedsvreemd water: omvang en effecten op oecosystemen. Vakgroep Aquatische Oecologie en Biogeologie, K.U. Nijmegen, pp 100-110.Arts, G.H.P. & R.F.M. Buskens (1998). The vegetation of soft-water lakes in The Netherlands in relation to human influence and restoratiuion measures, with special attention to the association Isoeto-Lobelietum. Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Geobotanik in Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg 57: 111-120.Arts, G.H.P. (1990). Detoration of atlantic soft-water systems and their flora. A historical account. Proefschrift Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 197 pp.Arts, G.H.P. (2000). Centrale vennen en Winkelsven. In: Hommel, P.W.F.M., M.A.P. Horsthuis & V. Westhoff (red.). Excursieverslagen 1997. Plantensociologische Kring Nederland, pp 51-54. (008745).Arts, G.H.P., P.W.M. van Beers & J.D.M. Belgers (2001). Herstelbeheer in vennen en de floristische samenstelling van isoetide begroeiingen in de periode 1980-1999. Stratiotes 23: 33-39.Beers, P.W.M. van (1996). Onderzoek Brabantse vennen 1994. Rapport Provincie Noord-Brabant, dienst Waterstaat, Milieu en Vervoer.Beije, H.M. (1978). Vegetatiekartering van het Beerzedal in Kampina. Vereniging tot behoud van natuurmonumenten in Nederland, 's-Graveland, 46 pp.Belle, F. van (1992). Kampina - Oisterwijkse bossen en vennen: beheersplan 1993.Brouwer, E. (2001). Restoration of Atlantic softwater lakes and perspectives for characteristic macrophytes. Proefschrift Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 133 pp.Brouwer, E., R. Bobbink, J.G.M. Roelofs & G.M. Verheggen (1996). Effectgerichte maatergelen tegen verzuring en eutrofiëring van oppervlaktewateren. Eindrapport monitoringsprogramma tweede fase. Rapport Vakgroep Oecologie, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 159 pp + bijl.Brouwer, E., R. Bobbink, J.G.M. Roelofs & G.M. Verheggen (1997). Effectgerichte maatergelen tegen verzuring en eutrofiëring van oppervlaktewateren. Tussenrapport 1996. Rapport Vakgroep Oecologie, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Brouwer, E., R. Bobbink, J.G.M. Roelofs & G.M. Verheggen (1998). Herstelbeheer in verzuurde en geeutrofieerde zachte wateren: waar en wanneer zinvol In: Bobbink, R.et al. (red). Effectgerichte maatregelen en behoud biodiversiteit in Nederland. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 29-52.Dam, H. van , A. Mertens & H. Heijnis (1994). Retropectieve monitoring van verzuring en eutrofiëring in het Kolkven en Van Esschenven bij Oisterwijk. Diatomededelingen 17: 31-32. (006744). Dijk, J. van & V. Westhoff (1960a). Situatie en milieu van Choorven, Witven en Van Eschenven in het licht van wijzigingen die zich in het decennium 1946-1956 daarin hebben voltrokken. In: J. van Dijk et al. Hydrobiologie van de Oisterwijkse vennen. Publicatienummer 5 van de Hydrobiologishce Vereniging, Amsterdam, pp 9-12.Dijk, J. van & V. Westhoff (1960b). De verandering in de vegetatie van het Choorvenvan 1948 tot en met 1955. In: J. van Dijk et al. Hydrobiologie van de Oisterwijkse vennen. Publicatienummer 5 van de Hydrobiologishce Vereniging, Amsterdam, pp 13-24.Doyer, W.J. (1922). Oisterwijk en omstreken. Amoeba 1: 71-72. (005391).Jonkheer, R. (1989). Vegetatiekartering Kampina 1988. Rapport Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten, 's-Graveland, 37 p. + 5 krt (R-0598).Maas, P.R.M. & M.J.A. Werger (1967). Natte hooiland- en Natte Heidevegetaties van het Natuurmonument `De Kampina' (Boxtel, Noord-Brabant). Instituut voor Systematische Plantkunde, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht. (R-0157)(R-0124).Margry, K. & O. Minkenberg (1984). Zoogdierinventarisatie in de Kampina, 22 t/m 26 september 1983. Mededeling nr 8, Veldwerkgroep van de Vereniging voor Zoogdierkunde en Zoogdierbescherming (VZZ), Leiden, 68 p.Meltzer, J. (1947). Voorloopig Rapport over de Beerzedal tusschen Spoordonk en Kampina. . (001995).Mörzer Bruijns, M.F. & H. Passchier (1943). De vegetatie van het Grote Huisven bij Oisterwijk. Wetenschappelijke Mededelingen van de Werkgroepen der Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging 1943: 1-20. (000259).Passchier, H. & V. Westhoff (1942). De plantengroei in en bij het dal van de Beerze. Natura 41: 91-94. (004058).Roelofs, H.J. & W. Vos (1979). Landschapsecologische relaties via het grondwater in De Kampina en omgeving. Rapport 213, De Dorschkamp, Wageningen100 p. Schoof-van Pelt , M.M. (1973). Littorelletea. A study of the vegetation of some amphiphytic communities of western Europe. Proefschrift Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 216 pp.Tjallingii, F. (1936). Verslag van de excursie, georganiseerd door de 'Commissie voor de Biosociologie en het Veenonderzoek van Nederland' der Nederlandsche Botanische Vereniging, op Vrijdag 7 Juni 1935 naar Boxtel en Oisterwijk, onder leiding van Prof. Dr R. Nordhagen.. Nederlandsch Kruidkundig Archief 46: 408-412. (004094).Vallenduuk, H. (1990). Makrofauna - onderzoek aan enkele vennen in het natuurmonument Kampina.Adviesburo Vallenduuk voor Hydrologisch Onderzoek, Boxtel, 81 pp.Verbeek, P.J.M. & S. de Goeij (red.) (1998). Vegetatiekartering, inventarisatie najaarslibellen en beheersadviezen van dertien vennen in 1997. Winkelsven-west (Kampina), Zandbergsven-20 (Kampina), Staalbergven (Oisterwijk), Achterste Goorven (Oisterwijk), Bankven (Goirle), Zwartven (Hooge Mierde), Pannegoorven (Cartierheide). Bureau Natuurbalans/Limes Divergens, Nijmegen, 119 pp.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code Cover [%]
NL01100.00

5.3 Site designation (optional)

Partly nature reserve of National NGO- Natuurmonumenten.

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Provincie Noord-Brabant
Address:
Email:

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY