Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

NL9801024

1.3 Site name

Gelderse Poort

1.4 First Compilation date

1998-10

1.5 Update date

2004-02

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Natura 2000 Department, Ministry of Economical Affairs
Address:               
Email:
Date site proposed as SCI:1998-07
Date site confirmed as SCI:2004-12
Date site designated as SAC: No data
National legal reference of SAC designation: No data

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:6.010000
Latitude:51.898600

2.2 Area [ha]

4967.0000

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
NL22Gelderland

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Atlantic (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
3150  info      0.00   
3270  info      0.00   
6120  info      0.00   
6430  info      0.00   
6510  info      0.00   
91E0  info      0.00   
91F0  info      0.00   
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
F1102Alosa alosa                 
M1337Castor fiber    20  20     
F1149Cobitis taenia           
F1163Cottus gobio           
F1099Lampetra fluviatilis           
F1145Misgurnus fossilis           
M1318Myotis dasycneme           
F1095Petromyzon marinus           
F1134Rhodeus sericeus amarus           
F1106Salmo salar           
A1166Triturus cristatus           
I1014Vertigo angustior                 
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N1020.00
N1510.00
N1411.00
N2310.00
N0910.00
N0626.00
N1613.00

Total Habitat Cover

100

Other Site Characteristics

Rivers, riverine grasslands. Site adjacent to pSCI NSG Salmorth, nur Teilfläche (DE-4102-302) in Nordrhein-Westfalen (only separated from each other by the Dutch part of the shipping lane in the river Rhine).

4.2 Quality and importance

One of the seven most important sites for the habitat type Xeric sand calcareous grasslands (6120). One of the five most important sites for the habitat type Alluvial forests (91E0, subtype Salicion albae). Important for wintering waterfowl and breeding marsh birds.Part of a major nature development program that included the re-introduction of Castor fiber. New IBA 037-00 (van den Tempel & Osieck 1994).

4.5 Documentation

Belangrijke zoogdiergebieden in Nederland (Dijkstra, 1997; VZZ) Bont, C. de (1994). Toekomst voor de natuur in de Gelderse poort. Deel 3: Historische geografie: inventarisatie en waardering. Rapport 298.3, Staring Centrum (SC-DLO), Wageningen, 63 pp + 1 krt. Boo, M. de (2001). Bomen, beesten en buitens. Staatsbosbeheer, Regio Gelderland, Arnhem, 280 pp. Brongers, M. (1994). De vegetatie van de natuurreservaten Duivelsberg, Ooypolderen Millingerwaard in 1993. A&W-rapport 92, Altenburg & Wymenga, Veenwouden, 40 pp + bijlagen. Doze, M. & P.P. Stoof (2000). Bouwstenen voor de Gelderse Poort. Afstudeerverslag TL 2000-26, Internationale Agrarische Hogeschool Larenstein, Velp, 63 pp. Eck, W. van (1994). Toekomst voor de natuur in de Gelderse poort. Deel 2: Landbouw: inventarisatie en effecten. Rapport 298.2, Staring Centrum (SC-DLO), Wageningen, 56 pp. Ganzen en zwanen in nederland. overzicht van de pleisterplaatsen in de periode 1985-94 (Koffijberg et al., 1997; SOVON) Harms, W.B. & J. Roos-Klein Lankhorst (red.)(1994).Toekomst voor de natuur in de Gelderse poort. Deel 1: Planvorming en evaluatie. Rapport 298.1, Staring Centrum (SC-DLO) en Grontmij, Wageningen, 254 pp + 6 krt. Heine, M. & G. van der Velde (1978). De muskusrat in de Ooypolder en zijn invloed op de nymphaeide vegetaties. De Levende Natuur 81: 8-9. Helmer, W & P.J.A.M. Smeets (1987). Natuur- en Landschapsontwikkeling in de Gelderse Poort, uitgewekt voor Ooijpolder en Millingerwaard. Rapport Staatsbosbeheer, Afdeling Landschapsecologie en -beheer, 99pp.. Helmer, W. (1993). Bevers in de Gelderse Poort. Rapport Wereld Natuur Fonds, Stichting Ark, Laag Keppel, 41 pp. Jongman, R.H.G. & J.A.A.M. Leemans (1982). Vegetatie-onderzoek Gelderse uiterwaarden. Rapport, Dienst Landinrichting en Landfbouw, afdeling natuur en Landschap, Provincie Gelderland, 99 pp + bijlagen. Knol, W.C., J. Roos-Klein Lankhorst, M. Kaagman , J.G.M. Rademakers & H.P. Wolfert (1994). Toekomst voor de natuur in de Gelderse poort. Deel 4: Ecologische evaluatie van de Gelderse Poort in Duitsland en Nederland. Rapport 298.4, Staring Centrum (SC-DLO), Wageningen, 146 pp. Maarel, E. van der & H.C.J. Oomen (1970). Biologische verliezen in de Ooypolder na verlegging van de Waal, aanvullend rapport november 1970. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Botanisch en Zoölogisch Laboratorium: 2-8. Monitoring van vogels in belangrijke vogelgebieden: broedvogels 1995, niet-broedvogels 1994/95 (Voslamber et al., 1998) Niewold, F.J.J. & G.J.D.M. Müskens (2000). Perspectief van de bever in Nederland. Herintroductie in de Gelderse Poort en ontwikkelingen elders van 1994-2000. Alterra-rapport 159, Alterra, Wageningen, 115 pp. Stuurgroep De Gelderse Poort (Arnhem). De Gelderse Poort: ontwikkelingsvisie. Stuurgroep De Gelderse Poort, Arnhem, 105 pp + 9 krt. Provincie Gelderland (2003). Gebiedsplan Natuur en Landschap Rivierenland. Diermen, J. van e.a. (2002). Vogels van de Gelderse Poort. Deel I Broedvogels (1960-2000). Faunawerkgroep Gelderse Poort. 336 pp.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code Cover [%]
NL014.00
NL2126.00

5.3 Site designation (optional)

Small parts protected by Nature Conservation Act (Weide Oude Rijnstrangen 3 ha; Oude Waal 82 ha). Partly nature reserves of State Forestry Service (Ooypolder and Millingerwaard 410 ha; Bemmelse-, Gendtse- en Klompenwaard 108 ha; Oude Rijnstrangen 348 ha) and WWF (Millingerwaard 150 ha; Ooijpolder 17 ha). Part qualifies for EU-Bird-directive. Adjoins German Natura 2000-site DE-4102-302.

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Largely State Forestry Service
Address:
Email:

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY