Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

PLH060045

1.3 Site name

Przełom Wisły w Małopolsce

1.4 First Compilation date

2001-03

1.5 Update date

2017-02

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska
Address:  Polska  52/54    Warszawa    00-922  Wawelska 
Email:kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl
Date site proposed as SCI:2007-08
Date site confirmed as SCI:2009-03
Date site designated as SAC: No data
National legal reference of SAC designation: No data

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:21.901500
Latitude:50.838300

2.2 Area [ha]

15170.8800

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
PL12Mazowieckie
PL31Lubelskie
PL33Świętokrzyskie

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
3150  info      377.91  0.00 
3270  info      393.03  0.00 
6120  info      15.12  0.00 
6210  info      105.81  0.00 
6430  info      408.14  0.00 
6440  info      75.58  0.00 
6510  info      1647.69  0.00 
9170  info      120.93  0.00 
91E0  info      559.31  0.00 
91I0  info      226.75  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
P1617Angelica palustris    100       
F1130Aspius aspius           
M1308Barbastella barbastellus                 
A1188Bombina bombina           
M1337Castor fiber           
F1149Cobitis taenia           
I4030Colias myrmidone           
P1902Cypripedium calceolus    10  20     
R1220Emys orbicularis                 
I1042Leucorrhinia pectoralis           
M1355Lutra lutra                 
I1060Lycaena dispar           
F1145Misgurnus fossilis           
M1323Myotis bechsteinii                 
M1318Myotis dasycneme                 
M1324Myotis myotis                 
I1037Ophiogomphus cecilia           
I6179Phengaris nausithous                 
I6177Phengaris teleius                 
F5339Rhodeus amarus           
P1437Thesium ebracteatum    100  500     
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N041.27
N0620.11
N1017.07
N1226.66
N1617.29
N172.98
N1910.25
N213.85
N230.53

Total Habitat Cover

100.00999999999999

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
LA01i
LA10.01i
LC01.01i
LD01.01i
MD01.02o
MD06i
HE01.03i
LE03.01i
LF02.03i
LF03.02i
MG02o
MG05.01i
MJ02.03i
MJ02.05.02i
MJ02.10i
HJ02.12i
MXb
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
LA01i
LA03i
LBi
LD01.01i
LF03.02i
ML08i
MXb

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type[%]
PublicNational/Federal0
State/Province0
Local/Municipal0
Any Public0
Joint or Co-Ownership0
Private0
Unknown100
sum100

4.5 Documentation

Chmielewski T.J. 1999. Projekt doskonalenia systemów obszarów chronionych Lubelszczyzny po zmianie podziału administracyjnego. NAVIP, Lublin. Msc. <br/><br/>Drożdżowska B. (kier.). 1995. Inwentaryzacja przyrodnicza gminy Annopol. <br/><br/>IOP PAN red. 2007 Raport dla Komisji Europejskiej z wdrażania Dyrektywy Siedliskowej w zakresie dotyczacym monitoringu msc., GIOŚ, Warszawa <br/><br/>Kucharczyk M. 1999. Przyrodnicze podstawy opracowania optymalnej koncepcji zagospodarowania doliny Wisły na odcinku od ujścia Sanny do ujścia Pilicy (km 295-456). Zadanie II. 3. - Charakterystyka flory badanego odcinka Wisły. Inst. Geogr.i Przestrz. Zagosp. PAN, Warszawa. <br/><br/>Kucharczyk M. 2001. Distribution Atlas of Vascular Plants in the Middle Vistula River Valley. UMCS Press, Lublin. <br/><br/>Wilgat T. (kier.). 1991. Inwentaryzacje przyrodnicze gmin: Janowiec, Józefów, Łaziska. Urząd Wojew,. Lublin. Msc. <br/><br/>Wilgat T. (kier.). 1991. Inwentaryzacje przyrodnicze gmin: Wilków, Puławy. Urząd Wojew., Lublin. Msc.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code Cover [%]
PL023.50
PL0320.38
PL0423.57

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites:

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code Site name Type Cover [%]
PL03Wrzelowiecki Park Krajobrazowy*0.46
PL04Solec nad Wisłą*14.05
PL02Wisła pod Zawichostem*1.37
PL04Kraśnicki Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu*2.04
PL02Krowia Wyspa+0.25
PL04Chodelski Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu*4.84
PL02Skarpa Dobrska+0.25
PL03Kazimierski Park Krajobrazowy*19.92
PL04Dolina rzeki Zwolenki*2.64

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Regionalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska w Lublinie
Address:
Email:sekretariat@rdos.lublin.pl
Organisation:Regionalny Dyrektor Ochrony Środowiska w Warszawie
Address:
Email:warszawa@rdos.gov.pl

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

X
Yes Name: Zarządzenie Regionalnego Dyrektora Ochrony Środowiska w Lublinie, Regionalnego Dyrektora Ochrony Środowiska w Warszawie i Regionalnego Dyrektora Ochrony Środowiska w Kielcach z dnia 31 marca 2015 r. w sprawie ustanowienia planu zadań ochronnych dla obszaru Natura 2000 Przełom Wisły w Małopolsce PLH060045
Link: http://edziennik.mazowieckie.pl/#/legalact/2015/4331/

No, but in preparation
No

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLH060045
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY