Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

PLH180024

1.3 Site name

Łukawiec

1.4 First Compilation date

2006-03

1.5 Update date

2017-07

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska
Address:  Polska  52/54    Warszawa    00-922  Wawelska 
Email:kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl
Date site proposed as SCI:2009-10
Date site confirmed as SCI:2011-03
Date site designated as SAC: No data
National legal reference of SAC designation: No data

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:23.072100
Latitude:50.051300

2.2 Area [ha]

2270.1800

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
PL32Podkarpackie

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
6410  info      46.95  0.00 
7140  info      6.33  0.00 
9110  info      8.05  0.00 
9170  info      662.79  0.00 
91D0  info      0.91  0.00 
91E0  info  X     59.4  0.00 
91F0  info      21.92  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
A1188Bombina bombina    51  100     
P1898Eleocharis carniolica    localities   
I1065Euphydryas aurinia    50     
I1060Lycaena dispar    10     
I6179Phengaris nausithous    10     
I6177Phengaris teleius    10     
A1166Triturus cristatus    11  100           
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N102.69
N120.14
N1646.17
N174.42
N1946.58

Total Habitat Cover

100

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
LF03.01.01i
HI01b
HI02i
HJ03.01b
MK01.03o
HK02.01b
MK03.04b
MK04.05i
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
MXb

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type[%]
PublicNational/Federal0
State/Province0
Local/Municipal0
Any Public0
Joint or Co-Ownership0
Private0
Unknown100
sum100

4.5 Documentation

1.Konsorcjum firm: EKKOM Sp. z o.o., Habitat Selection s.c. Kolecki Mateusz, Węgrzyn Michał. 2016. Plan zadań ochronnych dla obszaru Natura 2000 Łukawiec PLH180024 w województwie podkarpackim. Rzeszów.<br/>2.Makomaska – Juchiewicz M. (red.) 2010. Monitoring gatunków zwierząt. Przewodnik metodyczny. Część I. GIOŚ, Warszawa<br/>3.Makomaska-Juchiewicz M., Baran P. (red.). 2012. Monitoring gatunków zwierząt. Przewodnik metodyczny. Część II. GIOŚ, Warszawa<br/>4.Matuszkiewicz J. M., 2013, Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.<br/>5.Mróz, W. (red.). 2010. Monitoring siedlisk przyrodniczych. Przewodnik metodyczny: Część I. GIOŚ, Warszawa.<br/>6.Mróz, W. (red.). 2012. Monitoring siedlisk przyrodniczych. Przewodnik metodyczny: Część II. GIOŚ, Warszawa.<br/>7.Mróz, W. (red.). 2012. Monitoring siedlisk przyrodniczych. Przewodnik metodyczny: Część III. GIOŚ, Warszawa.<br/>8.Oklejewicz K. 1997. Eleocharis carniolica (Cyperaceae) -- a species new to Poland. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica, 42(1): 194-195.<br/>9.Oklejewicz K., Paul W. Wayda M. 2001. Mapa autorska Eleocharis carniolica W. D. J. Koch [w:] Zając A. &amp; Zając M. (Red.) Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce. Nakładem Pracowni Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, s. 207.<br/>10.Paul W. 2004. Eleocharis carniolica W. D. J. Koch. W: Sudnik- Wójcikowska B., Werblan – Jsakubiec H. (red.) 2004. Poradnik ochrony siedlisk i gatunków Natura 2000. Tom 9. Gatunki roślin. Wyd. Min. Środowiska, Warszawa; ss. 116–121.<br/>11.Paul W. Wayda M. 1999. New localities of Eleocharis carniolica (Cyperaceae) in Poland. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 44(1): 195-199.<br/>12.Perzanowska J. (red.). 2012. Monitoring gatunków roślin. Przewodnik metodyczny. Część II. GIOŚ, Warszawa<br/>13.Szafran G. 2007. Nowe stanowiska Gagea spathacea (Liliaceae) I Carex strigosa (Cyperaceae) na terenie Nadleśnictwa Lubaczów. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica Polonica 15(1): 51-60.<br/>

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code Cover [%]
PL020.55

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites:

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code Site name Type Cover [%]
PL02Moczary+0.55

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Regionalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska w Rzeszowie
Address:
Email:sekretariat.rzeszow@rdos.gov.pl

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLH180024
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY