Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

PLH300036

1.3 Site name

Zamorze Pniewskie

1.4 First Compilation date

2008-08

1.5 Update date

2017-02

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska
Address:  Polska  52/54    Warszawa    00-922  Wawelska 
Email:kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl
Date site proposed as SCI:2009-10
Date site confirmed as SCI:2011-03
Date site designated as SAC: No data
National legal reference of SAC designation: No data

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:16.202800
Latitude:52.513600

2.2 Area [ha]

305.3400

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
PL41Wielkopolskie

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
3140  info      2.44  0.00 
3150  info      90.06  0.00 
6510  info      1.53  0.00 
7140  info      58.62  0.00 
9170  info      20.15  0.00 
91E0  info      34.8  0.00 
91F0  info      19.84  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
A1188Bombina bombina    150         
M1337Castor fiber                 
P6216Hamatocaulis vernicosus           
P1903Liparis loeselii             
M1355Lutra lutra                 
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N0628.74
N125.59
N1665.68

Total Habitat Cover

100.01

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
MA08o
MBi
MB02.04i
LD01.02i
LF02.03i
LF03.01i
LF03.02.03i
LG02.08o
LG05.04i
MJ02.01i
MXb
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
MBi
LG02.08o
MXb

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type[%]
PublicNational/Federal0
State/Province0
Local/Municipal0
Any Public0
Joint or Co-Ownership0
Private0
Unknown100
sum100

4.5 Documentation

Anonymus - Inwentaryzacje Przyrodnicze - informacje o przeprowadzonych inwentaryzacjach przyrodniczych. <br/><br/>Brzeg A., Wojterska M. 2001. Zespoły roślinne Wielkopolski, ich stan poznania i zagrożenie. W: M. Wojterska (red.). Szata roślinna Wielkopolski i Pojezierza Południowopomorskiego. Przew. Sesji Ter. 52. Zjazdu PTB, 24-28. 09.01. s. 4-110.<br/><br/>Celka Z. - Materiały do znajomości szaty roślinnej Zamorza Pniewskiego. npbl <br/><br/>Gąbka M. - Ramienice jeziora Zamorze i Lubosz Wielki npbl <br/><br/>Gąbka M. 2004 Wybrane aspekty siedliskowe występowania ramienic w zarastających jeziorach śródleśnych Wielkopolski. W: L. Burchardt (red.). Zasługi Prof. dr hab. Izabeli Dąmbskiej w kształtowaniu dzisiejszego wizerunku ochrony przyrody. Sesja naukowa w 20 rocznicę śmierci Prof. dr hab. Izabeli Dąmbskiej 29-45<br/><br/>GĄBKA M. 2004 Zbiorowiska roślinne jezior humusowych Wielkopolski na tle ich uwarunkowań siedliskowych. Rozprawa doktorska. Zakład Hydrobiologii, Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza, Poznań <br/><br/>Gąbka M., Owsianny P. M. 2006 Shallow humic lakes of the Wielkopolska region - relation between dystrophy and eutrophy in lakes ecosystems Limnological Review 6 95-102<br/><br/>Gąbka M., Owsianny P. M. 2007 Lychnothamnus barbatus (Meyen) Leonhardii in the Wielkopolska region (NW Polska) - phytocoenoses and habitat characteristic. In: Algae in Ecological Quality of Water Assessment, XXVI International Phycological Conference, Lublin-Nałęczów, Polska Wyd. AR w Lublinie <br/><br/>Gąbka M., Owsianny P. M., Burchardt L., Sobczyński T. 2007 Habitat requirements of the Charetum intermediae phytocoenoses in lakes of western Polska Biologia, Bratislava 62(6) 657-663<br/><br/>Ochyra R. 1992. Czerwona lista mchów zagrożonych w Polsce. W: K. Zarzycki, W. Wojewoda, Z. Heinrich (red.). Lista roślin zagrożonych w Polsce. Wyd. 2. Inst. Bot. PAN, Kraków. s. 79-85.<br/><br/>Rusińska A. - Mszaki terenów podmokłych okolic Zamorza koło Pniew npbl <br/><br/>Siemińska J. i in. 2006 Red list of the algae in Polska. In: Z. Mirek, K. Zarzycki, W. Wojewoda, Z. Szeląg (eds.). Red list of plants and fungi in Polska, pp. 37-52. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków. <br/><br/>Zarzycki K., Szeląg Z. 2006 Red list of the vascular plants in Polska. In: Z. Mirek, K. Zarzycki, W. Wojewoda, Z. Szeląg (eds.). Red list of plants and fungi in Polska, pp. 9-20. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top No data

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Regionalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska w Poznaniu
Address:
Email:sekretariat.poznan@rdos.gov.pl

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLH300036
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY