NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM
For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
SITE | ES4250012 |
---|
SITENAME | Mina de la nava de Ricomalillo |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
Back to top1.1 Type
1.2 Site code
1.3 Site name
Mina de la nava de Ricomalillo |
1.4 First Compilation date
1.5 Update date
1.6 Respondent:
Name/Organisation: | Junta de Comunidades de Castilla- La Mancha. Consejería de Desarrollo Sostenible. D.G. de Medio Natural y Biodiversidad |
Address: |
|
Email: | rednaturaclm@jccm.es |
1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates
Date site proposed as SCI: | 2000-12 |
Date site confirmed as SCI: | 2006-07 |
Date site designated as SAC: | 2015-05 |
National legal reference of SAC designation: | Decreto 26/2015, de 07/05/2015, por el que se declaran como Zonas Especiales de Conservación (ZEC) de la Red Natura 2000 en Castilla-La Mancha, 40 Lugares de Importancia Comunitaria (LIC), se propone a la Comisión Europea la modificación de los límites de 14 de estos espacios y se modifican los límites de 8 Zonas de Especial Protección para las Aves (ZEPA). [NID 2015/5845] |
Explanation(s): | Plan de gestión aprobado mediante la Orden de 07/05/2015, de la Consejería de Agricultura, por la que se aprueban los Planes de Gestión de 41 espacios de la Red Natura 2000 en Castilla-La Mancha. [NID 2015/5849] |
2. SITE LOCATION
Back to top2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:
Longitude: | -4.953000 |
Latitude: | 39.661100 |
2.2 Area [ha]
2.3 Marine area [%]
2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):
2.5 Administrative region code and name
NUTS level 2 code
|
Region Name
|
---|
ES42 | Castilla-La Mancha |
2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Back to top3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them
Annex I Habitat types
|
Site assessment
|
---|
Code
|
PF
|
NP
|
Cover [ha]
|
Cave [number]
|
Data quality
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Representativity | Relative Surface | Conservation | Global |
---|
8310
|
|
| 0
| 1.00
| G
| B
| C
| B
| B
|
- PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
- NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
- Cover: decimal values can be entered
- Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)
3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
- Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)
3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)
Species | Population in the site | Motivation |
---|
Group
|
CODE
|
Scientific Name
|
S
|
NP
|
Size
|
Unit
|
Cat.
|
Species Annex
|
Other categories
|
---|
| | | | | Min | Max | | C|R|V|P | IV | V | A | B | C | D |
---|
I
| | Meta bourneti |
|
| 1
|
| i
| V
|
|
|
|
|
| X
|
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
- Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
- Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
Back to top4.1 General site character
Habitat class
|
% Cover
|
---|
N22 | 100.00 |
Total Habitat Cover | 100 |
---|
Other Site Characteristics
Refugio de quirópteros en mina abandonada cuya boca es de reducidas dimensiones, dando paso a una galería principal de unos 400 metros de longitud, de la cual parten galerías laterales, alguna de las cuales presenta pozos de profundidad indeterminada. En algunos tramos, la techumbre se ha derrumbado, apareciendo grandes bloques. |
4.2 Quality and importance
Se trata de una antigua mina de oro cuyos trabajos extractivos datan de la época romana y se extendieron hasta mediados del siglo XX, si bien en esta última época los resultados obtenidos fueron más bien escasos, extrayéndose únicamente ejemplares de oro nativo para enviar a los museos. La mayor actividad minera se produjo en la segunda mitad del siglo XIX, que es cuando se excavaron las grandes galerías existentes, en particular el socavón denominado Dos de Mayo, que es el mejor conservado en la actualidad.
Al cesar la actividad minera, el paso del tiempo ha ido provocando que se tapen las entradas por sucesivos derrumbes, quedando en la actualidad solo un pequeño espacio de acceso al socavón Dos de Mayo. Esto ha reducido las perturbaciones a las escasas visitas de aficionados y científicos, permitiéndose así el uso de las galerías como refugio de especies de quirópteros, entre los que destacan el murciélago grande de herradura, Rhinolophus ferromequinum, el murciélago mediterráneo de herradura, Rhinolophus euryale, el murciélago de cueva, Miniopterus schreibersi,así como Rhinolophus mehelyi, Rhinolophus hipposideros, Myotis emarginatus y Myotis myotis. |
4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site
The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site
Negative Impacts |
---|
Rank | Threats and pressures [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
L | B02.04 | | i |
L | C01.04 | | i |
L | G01.02 | | i |
L | G01.04.02 | | i |
L | G01.04.03 | | i |
L | G05.04 | | i |
M | L05 | | i |
Positive Impacts |
---|
Rank | Activities, management [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both
4.4 Ownership (optional)
Type | [%] |
---|
Public | National/Federal | 0 |
State/Province | 0 |
Local/Municipal | 0 |
Any Public | 1.95 |
Joint or Co-Ownership | 0 |
Private | 98.05 |
Unknown | 0 |
sum | 100 |
4.5 Documentation (optional)
Oscar de Paz, Jesus de Lucas, Begoña del Horno. Estudio de las poblaciones de quirópteros cavernicolas en los principales refugios de las provincias de cuenca, ciudad real, toledo, guadalajara (años 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 y 2008)
VVAA. "Buenasbodas. El oro de los montes de Toledo". Cuaderno de Campo. Bocamina, revista del Grupo de Mineralogía de Madrid. |
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
Back to top5.1 Designation types at national and regional level (optional):
Code
|
Cover [%]
|
---|
ES00 | 100.00 |
5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites (optional):
No information provided
5.3 Site designation (optional)
No information provided
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
Back to top6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:
Organisation: | Junta de Comunidades de Castilla- La Mancha. Consejería de Desarrollo Sostenible. D.G. de Medio Natural y Biodiversidad |
Address: | |
Email: | rednaturaclm@jccm.es |
6.2 Management Plan(s):
An actual management plan does exist:
6.3 Conservation measures (optional)
Medidas de gestión y conservación contempladas en el plan de gestión del espacio Red Natura. |
7. MAP OF THE SITE
Back to top
No information provided
SITE DISPLAY