Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

FI1104401

1.3 Site name

Itämäki-Eteläjoki

1.4 First Compilation date

1996-10

1.5 Update date

2018-12

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Metsähallitus, Pohjanmaa-Kainuun luontopalvelut
Address:               
Email:

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site proposed as SCI:1998-08
Date site confirmed as SCI: No information provided
Date site designated as SAC:2015-04
National legal reference of SAC designation:Asetus 354/2015

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:26.700000
Latitude:64.104200

2.2 Area [ha]

444.0000

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):


No information provided

2.5 Administrative region code and name


No information provided

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Boreal (0.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
3260  info      1.78  0.00 
6510  info      0.00 
7140  info      12.4  0.00 
7160  info      0.239  0.00 
7230  info      33.8  0.00 
7310  info      39.1  0.00 
8220  info      0.165  0.00 
9010  info      200  0.00 
9050  info      16.1  0.00 
91D0  info      83.1  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
Carex buxbaumii subsp. buxbaumii                   
Carex capillaris                   
Carex digitata                   
Dactylorhiza incarnata subsp. incarnata                   
Daphne mezereum                   
Epilobium davuricum                   
Eriophorum gracile                   
Eriophorum latifolium                   
Haploporus odorus                   
Hylocomiastrum umbratum                   
Juncus stygius                   
Listera ovata                   
Meesia triquetra                   
Parnassia palustris                   
Phellinus populicola                   
Schistostega pennata                   
Selaginella selaginoides                   
Splachnum melanocaulon                   
Tofieldia pusilla                   
Viburnum opulus                   
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N0720.00
N1780.00

Total Habitat Cover

100

Other Site Characteristics

Eläin- ja kasvilajistoltaan arvokas vanhojen metsien, lehtojen, lettojen ja puustoisten soiden vaihteleva kokonaisuus, jossa on myös niitty hylätyn tilan pihapiirissä.

4.2 Quality and importance

Eteläjoen- Itämäen alueella on arvokkaita vanhan metsän alueita. Itämäessä on lisäksi lehtoja, niittyjä, luonnontilaisia soita ja runsaasti uhanalaisia lajeja. Lehtojen kasvillisuus on pääosin tuoretta metsäkurjenpolvi-oravanmarjatyypin (Go-MaT) -lehtoa, mutta notkelmissa tavataan myös hiirenporras- ja korpi-imarrevaltaista saniaislehtoa ja lehtokorpea. Rytisuolla on erittäin edustavia lähteisiä lettokorpia ja -rämeitä, joilla on hyvin vaateliasta lajistoa. Kohdan 3.3. kasvilajien peruste D = alueellinen uhanalaisuus. Suojelutavoitteen määrittely: Kaikki tietolomakkeen taulukossa 3.1 ja 3.2 mainitut luontotyypit ja lajit kuuluvat alueen suojeluperusteisiin ja kaikkien niiden suojelutavoitteena on vähintäänkin alueen merkityksen säilyttäminen osana verkostoa. Lisäksi alueen suojelussa ja hoidossa painotetaan seuraavia tavoitteita: •alueella vallitseva luontotyyppien ja lajien sekä niiden elinympäristöjen tila säilytetään turvaamalla luonnon omien prosessien mukainen kehitys, •luontotyypin tai lajin elinympäristön laatua tai lajin populaatiokoon elinvoimaisuutta parannetaan ennallistamis- ja hoitotoimenpitein.

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
Li
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type[%]
PublicNational/Federal99
State/Province0
Local/Municipal0
Any Public0
Joint or Co-Ownership0
Private1
Unknown0
sum100

4.5 Documentation (optional)

Rajasärkkä, A. 1996: Pohjanmaan puistoalueen linnuston linjalaskennat 1996. - Julkaisematon selvitys. Metsähallitus. Komiteanmietintö 1988:16; Lehtojensuojelutyöryhmän mietintö. Tietokantatäydennys 2016: Metsähallitus 2013: Luontotyyppi-inventointi. MHGIS ja YSAGIS -tietokannat, luontotyyppi-aineisto 15.11.2013. Metsähallitus 2013: Linnuston linjalaskennat.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level (optional):

Code Cover [%]
FI0090.00
FI0310.00

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites (optional):


No information provided

5.3 Site designation (optional)

Eteläjoki on vanhojen metsien suojelualue. Itämäessä on lehtojensuojeluohjelman kohde. Lisäksi alueeseen sisältyy pieni yksityinen suojelualue. Alueen suojelu toteutetaan luonnonsuojelulain keinoin.

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Metsähallitus
Address:
Email:

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)


No information provided

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes
X
No

SITE DISPLAY