NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM
For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
SITE | FI1200452 |
---|
SITENAME | Honkajoen lehto |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
Back to top1.1 Type
1.2 Site code
1.3 Site name
1.4 First Compilation date
1.5 Update date
1.6 Respondent:
Name/Organisation: | Kainuun elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ympäristökeskus |
Address: |
|
Email: | |
1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates
Date site proposed as SCI: | 1998-08 |
Date site confirmed as SCI: |
No data
|
Date site designated as SAC: | 2015-04 |
National legal reference of SAC designation: | Asetus 354/2015 |
2. SITE LOCATION
Back to top2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:
Longitude: | 27.775000 |
Latitude: | 64.706700 |
2.2 Area [ha]
2.3 Marine area [%]
2.4 Sitelength [km]:
2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Back to top3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them
Annex I Habitat types
|
Site assessment
|
---|
Code
|
PF
|
NP
|
Cover [ha]
|
Cave [number]
|
Data quality
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Representativity | Relative Surface | Conservation | Global |
---|
3260
|
|
| 1
| 0.00
| G
| A
| C
| B
| A
|
7160
|
|
| 0.01
| 0.00
| G
| A
| C
| A
| B
|
9050
|
|
| 6.7
| 0.00
| G
| B
| C
| A
| B
|
91D0
|
|
| 1
| 0.00
| G
| A
| C
| A
| B
|
- PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
- NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
- Cover: decimal values can be entered
- Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)
3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them
Species
|
Population in the site
|
Site assessment
|
---|
G
|
Code
|
Scientific Name
|
S
|
NP
|
T
|
Size
|
Unit
|
Cat.
|
D.qual.
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Min | Max | | | | Pop. | Con. | Iso. | Glo. |
---|
P | 1955 | Diplazium sibiricum |
|
| p
| 7950
| 7950
| shoots
|
| G
| C
| B
| C
| B
|
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
- Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)
3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)
Species | Population in the site | Motivation |
---|
Group
|
CODE
|
Scientific Name
|
S
|
NP
|
Size
|
Unit
|
Cat.
|
Species Annex
|
Other categories
|
---|
| | | | | Min | Max | | C|R|V|P | IV | V | A | B | C | D |
---|
P
| | Humulus lupulus |
|
|
|
|
| R
|
|
|
|
|
| X
|
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
- Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
- Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
Back to top4.1 General site character
Habitat class
|
% Cover
|
---|
N06 | 5.00 |
N07 | 5.00 |
N19 | 90.00 |
Total Habitat Cover | 100 |
---|
Other Site Characteristics
Alueella on edustavia puronvarsilehtoja sekä näiden vaateliaita ja alueellisesti uhanalaisia kasvilajeja, mm. humalaa ja myyränporrasta.
Honkajoen varsilla sekä ympäröivien vaarojen alarinteillä sijaitseva lehtoalue. Jokivarressa on luhtaisia ruoho- ja heinäkorpia sekä kosteita suurruoholehtoja ja -lehtokorpia, pienellä alalla myös kotkansiipilehtokorpea. Honkajokivarressa on luonnonvaraisen humalan pohjoisin esiintymä itäisessä Suomessa. Sivupuron varressa on hyvin edustavaa lehtotähtimövaltaista puronvarsilehtoa ja rinteillä tuoretta metsäkurjenpolvi-käenkaali-oravanmarjalehtoa. Alueella esiintyy useita vaateliaita kasvilajeja. |
4.2 Quality and importance
Kaikki tietolomakkeen taulukoissa 3.1 ja 3.2 mainitut luontotyypit ja lajit (lukuun ottamatta edustavuudeltaan luokkaan D luokiteltuja luontotyyppejä ja populaation merkittävyyden osalta luokkaan D luokiteltuja lajeja) kuuluvat alueen suojeluperusteisiin ja kaikkien niiden suojelutavoitteena on vähintäänkin alueen merkityksen säilyttäminen osana verkostoa.
Lisäksi alueen suojelussa ja hoidossa painotetaan seuraavia tavoitteita:
- alueella vallitseva luontotyyppien ja lajien sekä niiden elinympäristöjen tila säilytetään turvaamalla luonnon omien prosessien mukainen kehitys. |
4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site
The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site
Negative Impacts |
---|
Rank | Threats and pressures [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
M | B02 | | b |
Positive Impacts |
---|
Rank | Activities, management [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both
4.4 Ownership (optional)
Type | [%] |
---|
Public | National/Federal | 0 |
State/Province | 0 |
Local/Municipal | 0 |
Any Public | 0 |
Joint or Co-Ownership | 0 |
Private | 100 |
Unknown | 0 |
sum | 100 |
4.5 Documentation
Alapassi, M. & Alanen, A. 1988: Lehtojensuojelutyöryhmän mietintö. - Komiteanmietintö 1988 (16): 1 - 279. Helsinki. (Julkaistu artikkeli, avainsanat: lehdot, luonnonsuojelu, lehtometsät, lehtotyypit, lehtokasvillisuus, jalot lehtipuut)
Maastokäynti: 11.7.1983 K.kukko-oja
Natura-kohdekuvaus
Peruskartta 3441 11
Tietokantapäivitys 2016:
Luontotyyppi-inventointi. MHGIS- ja YSAGIS -tietokannat, luontotyyppiaineisto 15.11.2013.
Suomen ympäristökeskus 2014: Hertta (Eliölajit-tietojärjestelmä) 3/2014. |
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
Back to top5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:
Code
|
Cover [%]
|
---|
FI00 | 100.00 |
5.3 Site designation (optional)
Valtakunnallisen lehtojensuojeluohjelman kohde. Rajausta on laajennettu hieman pohjoiseen myyränportaan esiintymispaikkana tunnetun lehtokorpinotkon vuoksi. Alueen suojelu toteutetaan luonnonsuojelulain ja vesiluonnon osalta vesilain nojalla. |
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
Back to top6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:
Organisation: | Kainuun elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ympäristökeskus |
Address: | |
Email: | |
6.2 Management Plan(s):
An actual management plan does exist:
|
Yes
| |
| No, but in preparation |
X | No |
7. MAP OF THE SITE
Back to top
No data
SITE DISPLAY