NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM
For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
SITE | IE0001228 |
---|
SITENAME | Aughrusbeg Machair and Lake SAC |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
Back to top1.1 Type
1.2 Site code
1.3 Site name
Aughrusbeg Machair and Lake SAC |
1.4 First Compilation date
1.5 Update date
1.6 Respondent:
Name/Organisation: | National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht |
Address: |
|
Email: | datadelivery@chg.gov.ie |
1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates
Date site proposed as SCI: | 2003-06 |
Date site confirmed as SCI: |
No data
|
Date site designated as SAC: |
No data
|
National legal reference of SAC designation: |
No data
|
2. SITE LOCATION
Back to top2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:
Longitude: | -10.166200 |
Latitude: | 53.557600 |
2.2 Area [ha]
2.3 Marine area [%]
2.4 Sitelength [km]:
2.5 Administrative region code and name
NUTS level 2 code
|
Region Name
|
---|
IE01 | Border, Midland and Western |
2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Back to top3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them
Annex I Habitat types
|
Site assessment
|
---|
Code
|
PF
|
NP
|
Cover [ha]
|
Cave [number]
|
Data quality
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Representativity | Relative Surface | Conservation | Global |
---|
3110
|
|
| 42.24
| 0.00
| M
| D
|
|
|
|
3130
|
|
| 42.24
| 0.00
| M
| A
| C
| B
| A
|
4010
|
|
| 84.49
| 0.00
| M
| C
| C
| C
| C
|
- PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
- NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
- Cover: decimal values can be entered
- Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)
3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them
Species
|
Population in the site
|
Site assessment
|
---|
G
|
Code
|
Scientific Name
|
S
|
NP
|
T
|
Size
|
Unit
|
Cat.
|
D.qual.
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Min | Max | | | | Pop. | Con. | Iso. | Glo. |
---|
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
- Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)
3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)
Species | Population in the site | Motivation |
---|
Group
|
CODE
|
Scientific Name
|
S
|
NP
|
Size
|
Unit
|
Cat.
|
Species Annex
|
Other categories
|
---|
| | | | | Min | Max | | C|R|V|P | IV | V | A | B | C | D |
---|
P
| | Chara mucosa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| X
|
|
|
|
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
- Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
- Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
Back to top4.1 General site character
Habitat class
|
% Cover
|
---|
N01 | 10.00 |
N02 | 16.00 |
N04 | 8.00 |
N05 | 10.00 |
N06 | 12.00 |
N08 | 30.00 |
N09 | 1.00 |
N10 | 2.00 |
N22 | 10.00 |
N23 | 1.00 |
Total Habitat Cover | 100 |
---|
Other Site Characteristics
The site is located on the western seaboard, approximately 2 km west of the village of Cleggan in Co. Galway. It comprises a range of terrestrial, intertidal and marine habitats. The area is underlain by Omey granite. Aughrusbeg Lough is surrounded mostly by coastal heath with frequent outcropping rock. At its western side it is separated from the sea by a narrow machair plain. Lough Atalia is a tidal lake that is connected to the sea by a narrow intertidal inlet. An area of marine water is included, as well as several small islands (Dog Island, Roeillaun, Gooreen Island). Other habitats include sandy and shingle beaches and rocky shoreline. |
4.2 Quality and importance
The aquatic vegetation of Aughrusbeg Lake is unusual and has a high conservation value. Overall, it is a very clear, softwater, species-rich lake and, based on current interpretations (O Connor, 2015), is best described as a 3130 Oligotrophic to mesotrophic standing waters with vegetation of the Littorelletea uniflorae and/or of the Isoeto-Nanojuncetea lake. Small patches of the submerged vegetation may conform to 3110, while other areas are dominated by Chara spp. and could be aligned with the hard water lake habitat (3140).
Aughrusbeg Lake was surveyed in 1999 by Cillian Roden in a Heritage Council-funded study, and in September 2017 by Cilian Roden, Paul Murphy and Jim Ryan as part of the NPWS Mixed Najas flexilis lake habitat study. The lake is on granite bedrock and is separated from the sea by a small machair plain, creating sloping granite shores other than at the western end where there is a well-developed sand-shelf. It was ranked as having the highest conservation importance of the 15 coastal lakes surveyed in 1999 (Roden, 1999). The 2017 survey recorded 29 species, including seven Potamogeton species, one Potamogeton hybrid and three-species each of the charophytes Chara and Nitella, in 21 relevés. Euphotic depth was 5.2 m. The sand-shelf at the western end supports a population of what appears to be Chara muscosa (Roden, 1999; Roden et al., 2017). Chara muscosa is closely related to, and may even be an ecologically-induced form of Chara contraria (Stewart, 2017). It was described from Mullaghderg Lough, which remains its only definite world location, but no longer occurs in this site (Roden et al., 2017; Stewart, 2017). |
4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site
The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site
Negative Impacts |
---|
Rank | Threats and pressures [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
L | A05.02 | | i |
L | D03.01.01 | | i |
L | D03.01.02 | | i |
M | E01.03 | | o |
L | F02.01.01 | | b |
M | G05.09 | | i |
L | I01 | | b |
H | J01.01 | | i |
M | L07 | | i |
Positive Impacts |
---|
Rank | Activities, management [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
M | A04.02 | | i |
Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both
4.5 Documentation
NPWS (2013b) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Habitat Assessments Volume 2. Version 1.0. Unpublished Report, National Parks and Wildlife Services. Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland.
O Connor, Á. (2015) Habitats Directive Annex I lake habitats: a working interpretation for the purposes of site-specific conservation objectives and Article 17 reporting. Unpublished Report, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland.
Roden, C. M. (1999). A Survey of Coastal Lakes in Counties Galway, Mayo, Sligo and Donegal. Report produced for the Heritage Council. Unpublished.
Roden, C., Murphy, P. and Ryan, J. (2017) A report on the 2017 fieldwork undertaken as part of the 2015-18 Najas lake survey for NPWS. Unpublished Report to the National Parks and Wildlife Service, DCHG, Dublin.
Stewart, N.F. and Church, J.M. (1992). Red Data Books of Britain and Ireland: Stoneworts. JNCC. Petersborough.
Stewart, N.F. (2017) A Review of the Irish Records for Stoneworts (Charophytes). Unpublished Report to the National Parks and Wildlife Service, DCHG, Dublin. |
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
Back to top
No data
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
Back to top6.2 Management Plan(s):
An actual management plan does exist:
|
Yes
| |
| No, but in preparation |
X | No |
7. MAP OF THE SITE
Back to topINSPIRE ID: | IE.NPWS.PS.NATURA2000.SAC.IE0001228 |
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional) |
|
SITE DISPLAY