Database release:

SDF

NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

SITE	PLB120011
SITENAME	Babia Góra

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
2. SITE LOCATION
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
7. MAP OF THE SITE

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

1.1 Type

1.2 Site code

PLB120011

1.3 Site name

Babia Góra

1.4 First Compilation date

2001-05

1.5 Update date

2022-01

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:	Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska
Address:	Polska 52/54 Warszawa 00-922 Wawelska
Email:	kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site classified as SPA:	2007-10
National legal reference of SPA designation	rozp. Ministra Środowiska z dn. 12.01.2011 r. w sprawie obszarów specjalnej ochrony ptaków

2. SITE LOCATION

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:	19.555600
Latitude:	49.581100

2.2 Area [ha]

4915.6500

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):

No information provided

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code	Region Name
PL21	Małopolskie
PL22	Śląskie

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Alpine

(100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

No habitat types are reported for the site

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species					Population in the site						Site assessment
G	Code	Scientific Name	S	NP	T	Size		Unit	Cat.	D.qual.	A\|B\|C\|D	A\|B\|C
						Min	Max				Pop.	Con.	Iso.	Glo.
B	A223	Aegolius funereus			p	8	13	p	R	M	C	B	C	C
B	A223	Aegolius funereus			p	8	13	i		M	D
B	A229	Alcedo atthis			r	1	2	i		M	D
B	A259	Anthus spinoletta			r	3	5	i		M	D
B	A259	Anthus spinoletta			r	30	40	p	R	M	C	C	C	C
B	A104	Bonasa bonasia			p	30	60	i		M	D
B	A215	Bubo bubo			p	1	1	i		M	D
B	A030	Ciconia nigra			r	1	2	i		M	D
B	A264	Cinclus cinclus			r	8	13	p		M	C	C	C	C
B	A239	Dendrocopos leucotos			p	8	16	p		M	C	B	C	C
B	A236	Dryocopus martius			p	6	8	i		M	D
B	A320	Ficedula parva			r	4	6	i		M	D
B	A217	Glaucidium passerinum			p	15	21	p		M	B	B	C	B
B	A338	Lanius collurio			r	2	5	i		M	D
B	A246	Lullula arborea			r				P	M	D
B	A261	Motacilla cinerea			r	22	30	p		M	C	C	C	C
B	A241	Picoides tridactylus			p	13	21	p		M	B	B	C	B
B	A234	Picus canus			p	1	2	i		M	D
B	A267	Prunella collaris			r	1	3	p		M	B	B	C	B
B	A155	Scolopax rusticola			r				P	M	D
B	A220	Strix uralensis			p	3	5	i		M	D
B	A108	Tetrao urogallus			p	30	40	i		M	B	B	C	B
B	A282	Turdus torquatus			r	21	28	p		M	B	C	C	C

Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

No information provided

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

4.1 General site character

Habitat class	% Cover
N08	0.97
N09	0.29
N10	0.24
N12	0.32
N16	7.03
N17	56.71
N19	34.45
Total Habitat Cover	100.00999999999999

4.2 Quality and importance

No information provided

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
Rank	Threats and pressures [code]	Pollution (optional) [code]	inside/outside [i\|o\|b]
L	A01		i
L	A04.03		i
L	B		i
M	B01		i
L	B02.02		i
L	D01.01		i
L	E01.03		i
L	E03.01		i
M	F02.03		i
M	F03.01		i
L	G01		i
L	G02		i
L	H04		i
L	J02.04		i
M	X		b

Positive Impacts
Rank	Activities, management [code]	Pollution (optional) [code]	inside/outside [i\|o\|b]
L	A01		i
H	A03		i
L	B		i
L	D01.01		i
L	E01.03		i
L	G01		i
L	G02		i
L	J02.04		i
M	X		b

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type		[%]
Public	National/Federal	0
	State/Province	0
	Local/Municipal	0
	Any Public	0
Joint or Co-Ownership		0
Private		0
Unknown		100
sum		100

4.5 Documentation (optional)

1. Bocheński Z. M., Tomek T. 1998. Operat ochrony Fauny, Ptaki (Aves). Kraków. Msc. 2. Głowaciński Z. (red.). 2001. Polska czerwona księga zwierząt. Kręgowce. PWRiL, Warszawa. 3. Gromadzki M., Dyrcz A., Głowaciński Z., Wieloch M. 1994. Ostoje ptaków w Polsce. OTOP, Bibl. Monitor. Środ., Gdańsk. 4. Gromadzki M., Gromadzka J., Sikora A., Wieloch M. 2002. Wielkość populacji i trendy liczebności wybranych gatunków ptaków lęgowych w Polsce w latach 1991-2002. ZO PAN, Gdańsk. Msc. 5. Kieś B. 1991. Bird community in a natural beech wood of the lower mountain forest zone of Mt. Babia Góra. Acta Zool. Cracov. 34(2): 519-533.6. Pauli A. 1978. Od podnóża po szczyty. Poznaj Swój Kraj. 10(222): 13-14.7. Sidło P.O.,Błaszkowska B.&amp;Chylarecki P.(red.) 2004 Ostoje ptaków o randze europejskiej w Polsce. OTOP.Warszawa 8. Sikora A., Rhde Z., Gromadzki M., Neubauer G., Chylarecki P. 2007 Atlas rozmieszczenia ptaków legowych Polski 1985-2004 Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań 9. Tomiałojć L. (red.). 1990. Ptaki Polski. Rozmieszczenie i liczebność. PWN, Warszawa. ss. 462.10. Walczak M., Radziejowski J., Smogorzewska M., Sienkiewicz J., Gacka-Grzesikiewicz E., Pisarski Z. 2001. Obszary chronione w Polsce. IOŚ, III wyd., Warszawa. 11. Wilk T., Jujka M., Krogulec J., Chylarecki P. 2010 Ostoje ptaków o znaczeniu międzynarodowym OTOP Marki 12. Wołoszyn B. (red.). - - - -. Projekt Planu Ochrony Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego. 13. Zapisy poprzedniej wersji formularza SFD. Wersje historyczne dostępne w Generalnej Dyrekcji Ochrony Środowiska bądź na europejskiej witrynie internetowej http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/14. Dokumentacja Planu Zadań Ochronnych obszaru Natura 2000 PLB120011 w województwie małopolskim - szablon projektu dokumentacji planu. 2013.15. Żurek Z., Armatys P. 2011. Występowanie głuszca Tetrao urogallus w polskich Karpatach Zachodnich - wnioski z monitoringu w latach 2005-2010 oraz końcowa ocena liczebności karpackich subpopulacji głuszca i cietrzewia. Studia i materiały CEPL R.13, Zeszyt 2 (27)/2011, Rogów.16. Zawadzka D., Ciach M. 2013. Cietrzew Tetrao tetrix. W: Zawadzka, Ciach M., Figarski T., Kajtoch Ł., Rejt Ł. Materiały do wyznaczania i określania stanu zachowania siedlisk ptasich w obszarach specjalnej ochrony ptaków Natura 2000. GDOŚ, Warszaw, ss. 53-57. 17. Chodkiewicz T., Kuczyński L., Sikora A., Chylarecki P., Neubauer G., Ławicki Ł., Stawarczyk T. 2015. Ocena liczebności populacji ptaków lęgowych w Polsce w latach 2008–2012. Ornis Polonica 56: 149-189. 18. Hotała P. 2016. Siwerniak Anthus spinoletta- charakterystyka oraz monitoring gatunku wysokogórskiego na terenie Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego. Rocznik Babiogórski 17: 39-44. 19. Ciach M. 2016. Cietrzew Tetrao tetrix W: Wilk T., Bobrek R., Pępkowska-Król A., Neubauer G., Kosinski J.Z. (red) 2016. Ptaki polskich Karpat – stan, zagrożenia, ochrona. OTOP, Marki. 20. Projekt Planu Ochrony Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego z dnia 31 VIII 2016r. 21. Uzasadnienie Babiogórskiego Parku narodowego z dnia 6 IV 2017r., w sprawie zmiany oceny populacji cietrzewia.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level (optional):

Code	Cover [%]
PL01	68.43
PL04	15.91

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites (optional):

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code	Site name	Type	Cover [%]
PL04	Południowomałopolski Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu	*	15.91
PL01	Babiogórski Park Narodowy	*	68.43

5.3 Site designation (optional)

No information provided

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:	Regionalny Dyrektor Ochrony Środowiska w Krakowie
Address:
Email:	sekretariat.krakow@rdos.gov.pl

Organisation:	Dyrektor Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego
Address:
Email:	park@bgpn.pl

Organisation:	Regionalny Dyrektor Ochrony Środowiska w Katowicach
Address:
Email:	sekretariat.katowice@rdos.gov.p

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

X	Yes	Name: Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 22 lipca 2019 r. w sprawie ustanowienia planu ochrony dla Babiogórskiego Parku Narodowego Link: https://dziennikustaw.gov.pl/DU/rok/2019/pozycja/1699
	No, but in preparation
	No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

No information provided

7. MAP OF THE SITE

INSPIRE ID:

PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLB120011

Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)

Yes

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

1.1 Type

1.2 Site code

1.3 Site name

1.4 First Compilation date

1.5 Update date

1.6 Respondent:

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

2. SITE LOCATION

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

2.2 Area [ha]

2.3 Marine area [%]

2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):

2.5 Administrative region code and name

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

4.1 General site character

Total Habitat Cover

4.2 Quality and importance

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

4.4 Ownership (optional)

4.5 Documentation (optional)

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level (optional):

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites (optional):

5.3 Site designation (optional)

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

6.2 Management Plan(s):

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

7. MAP OF THE SITE

SITE DISPLAY