Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

PLH020102

1.3 Site name

Łąki Gór i Pogórza Izerskiego

1.4 First Compilation date

2007-04

1.5 Update date

2020-10

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska
Address:  Polska  52/54    Warszawa    00-922  Wawelska 
Email:kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site proposed as SCI:2009-10
Date site confirmed as SCI:2011-03
Date site designated as SAC:2022-01
National legal reference of SAC designation:rozp. MKiŚ z dn. 14.10.2021 r. w spr. soo Łąki Gór i Pogórza Izerskiego (PLH020102)

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:15.412200
Latitude:50.927200

2.2 Area [ha]

6433.4100

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):


No information provided

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
PL51Dolnośląskie

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental (100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
6230  info      2.57  0.00 
6410  info      96.5  0.00 
6430  info      1.29  0.00 
6510  info      1160.59  0.00 
6520  info      624.04  0.00 
7230  info      4.5  0.00 
8150  info      0.64  0.00 
8220  info      0.06  0.00 
9170  info      3.86  0.00 
9180  info      1.29  0.00 
9190  info      3.22  0.00 
91E0  info      3.22  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
M1308Barbastella barbastellus               
M1352Canis lupus   
I1065Euphydryas aurinia           
M1355Lutra lutra               
I1060Lycaena dispar           
M1361Lynx lynx   
M1324Myotis myotis               
I1037Ophiogomphus cecilia                 
I6179Phengaris nausithous           
I6177Phengaris teleius           
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)


No information provided

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N060.02
N1013.56
N1261.35
N165.61
N177.74
N1911.37
N230.35

Total Habitat Cover

100

4.2 Quality and importance


No information provided

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
MA02i
HA04.03i
LA10i
LB01i
LC01.01.01i
HD01i
LD01.02i
LD02.01i
ME01.03i
HG01i
LJ01i
MXb
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
LA03i
LA04i
LD01.02i
LD02.01i
MXb

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type[%]
PublicNational/Federal0
State/Province0
Local/Municipal0
Any Public0
Joint or Co-Ownership0
Private0
Unknown100
sum100

4.5 Documentation (optional)

1.Berdowski W. 1999 Inwentaryzacja przyrodnicza województwa jeleniogórskiego. Stara Kamienica. Rośliny i grzyby. T. I i III "Fulica" Jankowski W., Wrocław. Maszynopis, depon: Dolnośląski Urząd Wojewódzki, Oddział J. Góra 2.Jankowski W., Bartmańska J., Paszkiewicz R., Szkudlarek R., Pałucki A., Jabłoński A., Kusznierz J., 1994 Inwentaryzacja stanowisk chronionych gatunków zwierząt na terenie gminy Mirsk, maszynopis "Fulica" Jankowski Wojciech, Wrocław, depon: Dolnośląski Urząd Wojewódzki, Oddział Jelenia Góra 3.Jankowski W., Podsadowska R., Paszkiewicz R., Szkudlarek R., Pałucki A., Maślak A., i inni 1999 Inwentaryzacja przyrodnicza województwa jeleniogórskiego. Stara Kamienica. Zwierzęta. T. II i IV., maszynopis "Fulica" Jankowski Wojciech, Wrocław, depon: Dolnośląski Urząd Wojewódzki, Oddział Jelenia Góra 4.Koła W., Potocka J. 1994 Inwentaryzacja stanowisk chronionych gatunków roślin na terenie gminy Mirsk "Fulica" Jankowski W., Wrocław. Maszynopis, depon: Dolnośląski Urząd Wojewódzki, Oddział J. Góra 5.Koła W., Potocka J. 1994 Inwentaryzacja stanowisk chronionych gatunków roślin na terenie miasta Świeradów Zdrój "Fulica" Jankowski W., Wrocław. Maszynopis, depon: Dolnośląski Urząd Wojewódzki, Oddział J. Góra 6.Świerkosz K., Narkiewicz C. 2004. Flora i zbiorowiska roslinne Pogórza Izerskiego wraz z Obniżeniem Żytawsko-Zgorzeleckim. [w:] J. Fabiszewski (red.) Wartości botaniczne wybranych pasm Sudetów. Prace Wroc. Tow. nauk Ser. B. 213: 45-58.7.Flousek J., Zając T., Kutal M., Żuczkowski M., Pałucki A., Pudil M. & Kafka P. 2014: Velké šelmy (Carnivora) v Krkonoších, Jizerských horách, Górach Stołowych a na Broumovsku (Česká republika, Polsko) – minulost a přítomnost. Opera Corcontica 51: 37–59 8.Atlas ssaków Polski, Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN: http://www.iop.krakow.pl/ssaki/ 9.Dostál L. 2013: Výskyt rysa v Jizerských horách. In: Karpaš R., Višňák R. & Vonička P. (eds), Jizerské hory. O rašeliništích, květeně a zvířeně. Nakl. RK Liberec: 384.10.Dostál L., Pudil M. & Vonička P. 2013:Obratlovci Jizerských hor. In: Karpaš R.,Višňák R. & Vonička P. (eds), Jizerské hory. O rašeliništích, květeně a zvířeně. Nakl. RK Liberec: 358–385.11.http://www.selmy.cz/data/docs/clanky/Flousek_2014_Velke%20selmy_OC.pdf 12.IBS PAN 2010: Komunikat z dnia 05. 01. 2010 r. Przebieg inwentaryzacji wilka i rysia w Polsce w latach 2000 – 2009 [on line]. [cit. 5. 3. 2014]: http://www.zbs.bialowieza.pl/artykul/528.html 13.Kutal M. & Suchomel J. (eds) 2014: Velké šelmy na Moravě a ve Slezsku. Univ. Palackého Olomouc. 190 str. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Miroslav_Kutal/publication/270573908_Velke_selmy_na_Morave_a_ve_Slezsku_Large_carnivores_in_Moravia_and_Silesia/links/54ae39200cf2828b29fcc2ab/Velke-selmy-na-Morave-a-ve-Slezsku-Large-carnivores-in-Moravia-and-Silesia.pdf 14.Pałucki A. 2018. Informacje na temat wilka Canis lupus i rysia Lynx lynx – dane niepublikowane.15.Żuczkowski M. & Żuczkowski M. 2012: Na tropie rysia. Karkonosze 2012, 3: 20–22.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top No information provided

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:Regionalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska we Wrocławiu
Address:
Email:sekretariat.wroclaw@rdos.gov.pl

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)


No information provided

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top
INSPIRE ID:PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLH020102
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
X
Yes
No

SITE DISPLAY