Database release:

SDF

NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

SITE	PLH060031
SITENAME	Uroczyska Lasów Janowskich

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
2. SITE LOCATION
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
7. MAP OF THE SITE

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

1.1 Type

1.2 Site code

PLH060031

1.3 Site name

Uroczyska Lasów Janowskich

1.4 First Compilation date

2009-01

1.5 Update date

2019-11

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:	Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska
Address:	Polska 52/54 Warszawa 00-922 Wawelska
Email:	kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site proposed as SCI:	2006-09
Date site confirmed as SCI:	2009-03
Date site designated as SAC:	No data
National legal reference of SAC designation:	No data

2. SITE LOCATION

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:	22.246700
Latitude:	50.675500

2.2 Area [ha]

34230.1100

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code	Region Name
PL31	Lubelskie
PL32	Podkarpackie

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Continental

(100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types						Site assessment
Code	PF	NP	Cover [ha]	Cave [number]	Data quality	A\|B\|C\|D	A\|B\|C
						Representativity	Relative Surface	Conservation	Global
2330			36.07	0.00	M	A	C	A	A
3130			34.54	0.00	M	B	C	B	B
3150			0.35	0.00	M	D	-	-	-
3160			0.35	0.00	M	D	-	-	-
3260			18.31	0.00	M	C	C	B	C
3270			0	0.00	M	B	C	B	C
4030			327.08	0.00	M	B	C	B	B
6120			74.62	0.00	M	B	C	A	B
6230			9.67	0.00	M	C	C	B	C
6410			45.6	0.00	M	B	C	B	B
6430			0.35	0.00	M	D	-	-	-
6510			652.89	0.00	M	A	C	B	B
7110			142.81	0.00	M	B	C	B	B
7120			1.04	0.00	M	D	-	-	-
7140			241.81	0.00	M	A	C	A	A
7150			14.85	0.00	M	A	C	A	A
9110			15.2	0.00	M	D	-	-	-
9170			770.34	0.00	M	B	C	B	B
91D0			976.33	0.00	M	A	C	B	A
91E0			241.81	0.00	M	B	C	B	B
91F0			0.35	0.00	M	D	-	-	-
91P0			680.52	0.00	M	A	B	B	A
91T0			0.35	0.00	M	D	-	-	-

PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
Cover: decimal values can be entered
Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species					Population in the site						Site assessment
G	Code	Scientific Name	S	NP	T	Size		Unit	Cat.	D.qual.	A\|B\|C\|D	A\|B\|C
						Min	Max				Pop.	Con.	Iso.	Glo.
P	1617	Angelica palustris			p	500	1000	i		M	B	B	C	A
M	1308	Barbastella barbastellus			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
A	1188	Bombina bombina			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
M	1352	Canis lupus			p	15	18	i		M	B	B	C	B
M	1337	Castor fiber			p				C	M	C	B	C	B
F	1163	Cottus gobio			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
P	6216	Hamatocaulis vernicosus			p				P	M	D
F	1096	Lampetra planeri			p				R	M	C	B	B	B
I	1042	Leucorrhinia pectoralis			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
M	1355	Lutra lutra			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
I	1060	Lycaena dispar			p				C	M	C	B	C	B
F	1145	Misgurnus fossilis			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
M	1323	Myotis bechsteinii			p				R	M	C	B	C	C
M	1324	Myotis myotis			p				R	M	C	B	B	B
I	1037	Ophiogomphus cecilia			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
I	6179	Phengaris nausithous			p				R	M	C	B	C	C
I	6177	Phengaris teleius			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
P	1477	Pulsatilla patens			p		20	localities		M	C	C	C	C
F	5339	Rhodeus amarus			p				R	M	C	B	C	B
A	1166	Triturus cristatus			p				V	M	C	B	C	B

Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species					Population in the site				Motivation
Group	CODE	Scientific Name	S	NP	Size		Unit	Cat.	Species Annex		Other categories
					Min	Max		C\|R\|V\|P	IV	V	A	B	C	D

Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

4.1 General site character

Habitat class	% Cover
N06	4.92
N07	1.98
N08	0.00
N09	0.03
N10	3.47
N12	4.30
N16	3.00
N17	60.80
N19	21.48
N23	0.03
Total Habitat Cover	100.01

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
Rank	Threats and pressures [code]	Pollution (optional) [code]	inside/outside [i\|o\|b]
L	A01		i
M	A01		o
L	A04.03		i
L	A07		i
L	A08		i
M	A08		o
M	B		i
L	B01		i
M	B02.04		i
L	C01.01		i
L	C01.03		i
L	E01		i
M	E01		o
L	E03		o
L	E03.01		i
L	F01		i
L	F02.03		i
M	F03.01		i
M	F03.02.03		i
M	G02		i
L	H		o
L	H		i
M	J02.01		o
M	J02.01		i
M	X		b

Positive Impacts
Rank	Activities, management [code]	Pollution (optional) [code]	inside/outside [i\|o\|b]
M	A03		i
L	A04		i
L	C01.01		i
L	C01.03		i
L	F01		i
M	X		b

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.4 Ownership (optional)

Type		[%]
Public	National/Federal	0
	State/Province	0
	Local/Municipal	0
	Any Public	0
Joint or Co-Ownership		0
Private		0
Unknown		100
sum		100

4.5 Documentation

Buczyński P. 1994 Wstępne poznanie składu gatunkowego ważek (Odonata) Parku Krajobrazowego Lasy Janowskie, [w:] Radwan S., Sałata b., Szunke Z. (red.), Walory Przyrodnicze Parku Krajobrazowego Lasy Janowskie Wyd. UMCS Lublin, Lublin 69-70Buszko J. 1997. Atlas rozmieszczenia motyli dziennych w Polsce (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperiodea) 1986-1995. Ofic. Wyd. Turpress, Toruń. Chobotow J., Czarniawski W. 1999 Płazy i gady Parku Krajobrazowego Lasy Janowskie Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody 18 103-110Fijałkowski D. 1997. Szata roślinna Parku Krajobrazowego Lasy Janowskie. Wyd. UMCS, Lublin. Fijałkowski D., Adamczyk B., Polski A. 1991 Zbiorowiska roślinne projektowanego rezerwatu Łęka Ann. UMCS, sec. C 46 83-89Fijałkowski D., Adamczyk B., Polski A. 1991 Zespoły roślinne projektowanego rezerwatu Modrzewina Ann. UMCS, sec. C 46 91-97Fijałkowski D., Bloch M., Flisińska Z., Polski A., Wójciak H. 1992. Szata roślinna rezerwatu Imielty Ług. Ann. UMCS, sec. C. 47: 169-197.Fijałkowski D., Bloch M., Flisiński Z., Nycz B., Polski A., Wójciak H. 1992. Flora i zespoły projektowanego rezerwatu Bagno Rakowskie. Ann. UMCS, sec. C. 47: 199-237.Fijałkowski D., Mucha T., Polski A. 1990. Stosunki geobotaniczne rezerwatu Szklarnia. Ann. UMCS, sec. C. 45: 169-196.Fijałkowski D., Polski A. 1990. Stosunki geobotaniczne rezerwatu Lasy Janowskie. Ann. UMCS, sec. C. 45(16): 197-228.Fijałkowski D., Wawer M. 1994 Roślinność rezerwatu Kacze Błoto w województwie tarnobrzeskim Ann. UMCS, sectio C 49 119-132Gula R., Krzakiewicz H., Niemczyk J., Łukaciejewski G., Paszkiewicz R., Szkutnik M., Kalinowski W., 2002 Inwentaryzacja wilków i rysi w południowo-wschodniej Polsce Roczniki Bieszczadzkie 10 373-389Jędrzejewski W., Jędrzejewska B., Zawadzka B., Borowik T., Nowak S., Mysłajek R. W. 2008 Habitat suitability model for Polish wolves Canis lupus based on long-term national census Animal Conservation 11 377-390Jędrzejewski W., Niedziałkowska M., Mysłajek R. W., Nowak S., Jędrzejewska B. 2005 Habitat selection by wolves Canis lupus in the uplands and mountains of southern Polska Acta Theriologica 50 417-728Jędrzejewski W., Nowak S., Borowik T., Mysłajek R. W., Okarma H., Czarnomska S., Jędrzejewska B. 2008b Inwentaryzacja wilków i rysi w nadleśnictwach i parkach narodowych Polski. Raport z sezonu 2006/2007. Zakład Badania Ssaków PAN, Białowieża [maszynopis]. Jędrzejewski W., Nowak S., Schmidt K., Jędrzejewska B. 2002 Wilk i Ryś w Polsce - wyniki inwentaryzacji w 2001 roku Kosmos 51(4) 491-499Karczmarz K., Bloch M. 1983 Mszaki Kotliny Sandomierskiej. Fragm. Flor. et Geobot. 29 (1) 73-108Krawczyk R. 2005 Szata roślinna kompleksu stawów rybnych w Lipie (Kotlina Sandomierska) jako lokalne centrum bioróżnorodności Chroń. Przyr. Ojcz. 61 (4) 34-45Krawczyk R., Nobis A., Nobis M., Cwener A. 2008 Is Viola uliginosa critically endangered in Polskaś - new data on the distribution of the species Acta Soc. Bot. Polon. 77 (4) 345-349Krzaczek T. 1971 Rhynchosporetum albae W. Koch 1926 na terenie południowo- zachodniej Lubelszczyzny (Kotlina Sandomierska). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 17 (3) 409-412Krzaczek T., Krzaczek W. 1974 Torfowiska okolic Janowa Lubelskiego Ann. UMCS, sec. C 29 383-402Piskorski M. 2007 Fauna nietoperzy Parku Krajobrazowego Lasów Janowskich Nietoperze 8 (1-2) 3-11Radwan S., Sałata B., Harasimiuk M. (red.) 1997 Środowisko przyrodnicze Parku Krajobrazowego Lasy Janowskie Wydawnictwo UMCS, AR w Lublinie, PK Lasy Janowskie, Lublin.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code	Cover [%]
PL02	13.22
PL03	72.04

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites:

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code	Site name	Type	Cover [%]
PL02	Kacze Błota	+	0.49
PL02	Szklarnia	*	0.83
PL02	Imielty ług	+	2.37
PL02	Lasy Janowskie	*	8.32
PL02	Jastkowice	*	0.13
PL02	Łęka	+	1.09
PL03	Park Krajobrazowy Lasy Janowskie	*	72.04

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:	Regionalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska w Lublinie
Address:
Email:	sekretariat@rdos.lublin.pl

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

	Yes
	No, but in preparation
X	No

7. MAP OF THE SITE

INSPIRE ID:

PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLH060031

Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)

Yes

TABLE OF CONTENTS