NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM
For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
SITE | PLH140034 |
---|
SITENAME | Poligon Rembertów |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
Back to top1.1 Type
1.2 Site code
1.3 Site name
1.4 First Compilation date
1.5 Update date
1.6 Respondent:
Name/Organisation: | Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska |
Address: |
Polska
52/54
Warszawa
00-922
Wawelska
|
Email: | kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl |
1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates
Date site proposed as SCI: | 2009-10 |
Date site confirmed as SCI: | 2011-03 |
Date site designated as SAC: |
No information provided
|
National legal reference of SAC designation: |
No information provided
|
2. SITE LOCATION
Back to top2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:
Longitude: | 21.205000 |
Latitude: | 52.281900 |
2.2 Area [ha]
2.3 Marine area [%]
2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):
No information provided
2.5 Administrative region code and name
NUTS level 2 code
|
Region Name
|
---|
PL12 | Mazowieckie |
2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Back to top3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them
Annex I Habitat types
|
Site assessment
|
---|
Code
|
PF
|
NP
|
Cover [ha]
|
Cave [number]
|
Data quality
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Representativity | Relative Surface | Conservation | Global |
---|
2330
|
|
| 45.38
| 0.00
| G
| A
| C
| C
| C
|
4030
|
|
| 19.95
| 0.00
| G
| A
| C
| C
| C
|
7140
|
|
| 22.92
| 0.00
| G
| A
| C
| C
| C
|
91T0
|
|
| 0.65
| 0.00
| G
| C
| C
| C
| C
|
- PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
- NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
- Cover: decimal values can be entered
- Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)
3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
- Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)
3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)
No information provided
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
Back to top4.1 General site character
Habitat class
|
% Cover
|
---|
N04 | 18.61 |
N07 | 14.87 |
N08 | 4.79 |
N17 | 13.35 |
N19 | 48.39 |
Total Habitat Cover | 100.01 |
---|
4.2 Quality and importance
No information provided
4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site
The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site
Negative Impacts |
---|
Rank | Threats and pressures [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
H | E03 | | o |
H | I01 | | i |
H | I02 | | i |
M | J02.05 | | b |
H | K02.01 | | i |
Positive Impacts |
---|
Rank | Activities, management [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
H | A03 | | o |
H | A04 | | o |
Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both
4.4 Ownership (optional)
Type | [%] |
---|
Public | National/Federal | 0 |
State/Province | 0 |
Local/Municipal | 0 |
Any Public | 0 |
Joint or Co-Ownership | 0 |
Private | 0 |
Unknown | 100 |
sum | 100 |
4.5 Documentation (optional)
1.Dokumentacja planu zadań ochronnych obszaru Natura 2000 Poligon Rembertów PLH140034, pod kierownictwem Narodowej Fundacji Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa 2012 r.2.FPP Enviro - Ekspertyza przyrodnicza Raport z inwentaryzacji i oceny siedlisk gatunków płazów – kumaka nizinnego Bombina bombina oraz traszki grzebieniastej Triturus cristatus w obszarze Natura 2000 PLH140034 Poligon Rembertów , Warszawa 2018 r.3. Gobio Usługi Przyrodnicze - Ekspertyza przyrodnicza zalotki większej w obszarze Natura 2000 Poligon Rembertów PLH140034, Toruń 2018 r.4. Wolnicki J. 2011. Badania monitoringowe populacji strzebli błotnej w rezerwacie przyrody „Bagno Jacka” leżącym w granicach obszaru Natura 2000 PLH140034 „Poligon Rembertów” 5.Berger L. 1987. Impact of agriculture intensification on Amphibia. [w:] van Gilder J. J., Strijbosh H., Bergers P. J. M. (red.) Proceeding od the 4th Ordinary General Meeting of the S.E.H. Nijmengen.6.Blicharski M. 2002. Bogate stanowisko ropuchy paskówki Bufo calamita pod Warszawą. Kulon 7: 113-115.7.Dojdok Z., Pawlaczyk P. 2009. Inwazyjne gatunki roślin ekosystemów mokradłowych Polski. Wydawnictwo Klubu Przyrodników, Świebodzin, 167 str.8.Głowaciński Z., Rafiński J. 2003. Atlas płazów i gadów Polski. Status – rozmieszczenie - ochrona. Biblioteka monitoringu środowiska, Warszawa-Kraków.9.Górski P. 2008. Inwentaryzacja herpetofauny w 2008 r. Zakład Parazytologii i Inwazjologii, SGGW (mat. niepublik.).10.Jańczyk-Węglarska J. 1996. Strategie rozwoju osobniczego Calamagerostis epigejos (L.) Roth na tle warunków ekologicznych poznańskiego przełomu Warty. Wyd. UAM Poznań.11.Juraszek H. 1927. Pflanzensoziologische Studien uber die Dunen bei Warschau. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Lett., Cl. Sci. Math. Nat., Sér. B, 1927, Cracovie: 515–610.12.Juszczyk W., 1987. Płazy i gady krajowe. cz.2. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.13.Kujawa-Pawlaczyk J. 2004. Suche wrzosowiska (Callunop-Genistion, Pohlio-Callunion, Calluno-Arctostaphylion), W Herbich J. (red) Poradniki ochrony siedlisk i gatunków Natura 2000 – podręcznik metodyczny, Ministerstwo Środowiska T. 3. 32-48.14.Kondracki J. 2002. Geografia regionalna Polski. PWN, Warszawa.Kondracki J. 1998. Regionalizacja fizycznogeograficzna Polski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.15.Materiały TVN 24: http://www.tvnwarszawa.pl/informacje,news,warzywniak-w-rzece,59508.html.16.Matuszkiewicz J. 2008. Regionalizacja geobotaniczna Polski. IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.17.Młynarski M. 1987. Problemy ochrony płazów i gadów w Polsce. Chrońmy Przyrodę Ojczystą 3:18-26.18.Rybacki M., Maciantowicz M. 2006. Ochrona żółwia błotnego, traszki grzebieniastej i kumaka nizinnego. Wydawnictwo Klubu Przyrodników, Świebodzin.19.Samborska Z. 2009 „Wyspa Pomidorowa w Warszawie” W: Ostrowski M. (red) Warszawski Tryptyk Edukacyjny, tom II, skrypty, Warszawa, str. 179-184.20.Schischeiner L. 1990. Zmiany liczebności kumaka nizinnego Bombina bombina L. w stawach rybnych w Mydlnikach. II Ogólnopolska Konferencja Herpetologiczna, streszczenie referatów, Kraków 13-14.09.1990.21.Stolarz P. 2011. Rezerwat Bagno Jacka monografia przyrodnicza. Centrum Ekologii Człowieka, Warszawa pp 62.22.Stowarzyszenie Chrońmy Mokradła 2005. Wstępna waloryzacja przyrodnicza I propozycja kierunków ochrony przyrody poligonu w lasach Rembertowsko-Okuniewskich. Warszawa, mscr.23.Wolnicki J. 2008. Raport dotyczący projektu obszarów sieci NATURA 2000 w województwie mazowieckim w części dotyczącej wybranych gatunków minogów i ryb. Instytut Rybactwa Śródlądowego, Olsztyn, ss. 29 (mat. niepublik.).24.Wolnicki J. 2008-2010. Raporty roczne na temat realizacji wieloletniego projektu pt. „Ochrona populacji strzebli błotnej Eupallasella perenurus (Pallas, 1814) na obszarze Mazowsza” (mat. niepublik.).25.Wolnicki J, Kamiński R, Sikorska J. 2011: Occurrence, threats and active protection of the lake minnow Eupallasella percnurus (Pall.) in Mazowieckie Voivodship in Poland. Arch. Pol. Fish. 19: 209-216.26.Wolnicki J, Sikorska J, Kamiński R. 2008: Occurrence and conservation of the endangered cyprinid fish species lake minnow Eupallasella percnurus (Pallas 1814) in the Mazowieckie voivodeship in Poland. Teka Ochr. Kszt. Środ. Przyr – OL PAN 5: 190-198.27.Zaniewski P., Dingová A., Valachovič M., Wierzbicka M. 2012. The conservation status of Cladonio-Pinetum in Mazowiecki Landscape Park and adjacent areas (Poland) in: Lipnicki (eds.) Lichen protection - Lichen protected species. Gorzów Wlkp. – Lubsko: 177-189. |
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
Back to top5.1 Designation types at national and regional level (optional):
Code
|
Cover [%]
|
---|
PL02 | 7.51 |
PL04 | 99.96 |
5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites (optional):
Designated at national or regional level:
Type code
|
Site name
|
Type
|
Cover [%]
|
---|
PL02 | Bagno Jacka | * | 7.51 |
PL04 | Warszawski | * | 99.96 |
5.3 Site designation (optional)
No information provided
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
Back to top6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:
Organisation: | Regionalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska w Warszawie |
Address: | |
Email: | rdos.warszawa@rdos.gov.pl |
6.2 Management Plan(s):
An actual management plan does exist:
|
Yes
| |
| No, but in preparation |
X | No |
6.3 Conservation measures (optional)
No information provided
7. MAP OF THE SITE
Back to topINSPIRE ID: | PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLH140034 |
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional) |
|
SITE DISPLAY