NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM
For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
SITE | PLH240039 |
---|
SITENAME | Zbiornik Goczałkowicki - Ujście Wisły i Bajerki |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
Back to top1.1 Type
1.2 Site code
1.3 Site name
Zbiornik Goczałkowicki - Ujście Wisły i Bajerki |
1.4 First Compilation date
1.5 Update date
1.6 Respondent:
Name/Organisation: | Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska |
Address: |
Polska
52/54
Warszawa
00-922
Wawelska
|
Email: | kancelaria@gdos.gov.pl |
1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates
Date site proposed as SCI: | 2009-10 |
Date site confirmed as SCI: | 2011-03 |
Date site designated as SAC: |
No information provided
|
National legal reference of SAC designation: |
No information provided
|
2. SITE LOCATION
Back to top2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:
Longitude: | 18.870800 |
Latitude: | 49.920300 |
2.2 Area [ha]
2.3 Marine area [%]
2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):
No information provided
2.5 Administrative region code and name
NUTS level 2 code
|
Region Name
|
---|
PL22 | Śląskie |
2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Back to top3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them
Annex I Habitat types
|
Site assessment
|
---|
Code
|
PF
|
NP
|
Cover [ha]
|
Cave [number]
|
Data quality
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Representativity | Relative Surface | Conservation | Global |
---|
3150
|
|
| 1.56
| 0.00
| G
| C
| C
| C
| C
|
91E0
|
|
| 0.01
| 0.00
| P
| D
| -
| -
| -
|
- PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
- NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
- Cover: decimal values can be entered
- Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)
3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
- Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)
3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)
No information provided
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
Back to top4.1 General site character
Habitat class
|
% Cover
|
---|
N06 | 76.71 |
N07 | 12.12 |
N10 | 2.32 |
N12 | 3.52 |
N16 | 2.71 |
N19 | 2.40 |
N23 | 0.23 |
Total Habitat Cover | 100.00999999999999 |
---|
4.2 Quality and importance
No information provided
4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site
The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site
Negative Impacts |
---|
Rank | Threats and pressures [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
M | D01.02 | | b |
H | G01 | | i |
H | K01.03 | | b |
M | K03.04 | | i |
L | U | | b |
M | X | | b |
Positive Impacts |
---|
Rank | Activities, management [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both
4.4 Ownership (optional)
Type | [%] |
---|
Public | National/Federal | 0 |
State/Province | 0 |
Local/Municipal | 0 |
Any Public | 0 |
Joint or Co-Ownership | 0 |
Private | 0 |
Unknown | 100 |
sum | 100 |
4.5 Documentation (optional)
1.Kasza H., Parusel J. B. (Red.), Betleja J., Henel K. 1999 Chrońmy Zbiornik Goczałkowicki Przyroda Górnego Śląska 15 (wkładka)2.Król J. 2000. Występowanie żółwia błotnego na Górnym Śląsku. Przyr. Górn. Sląska. 21,3.3.Krzyżanek E, Kownacki A. (red.). 1987. Developement and structure of the Goczałkowice reservoir ecosystem. Ekol. Pol. 34.4.Parusel J. 2002, 2008 SFD Ostoja Goczałkowicka5.Parusel J. B. 2005 Opracowanie ekofizjograficzne do projektu strefy ochronnej Zbiornika Goczałkowickiego Mysłowice, maszynopis6.Starmach J, Kasza H. 1999. Ryby Zbiornika Goczałkowickiego. Przyr. Górn. Sląska. 7,14.7.Świerad J. 1995. Waloryzacja przestrzeni Górnego Śląska poprzez faune ssaków. Fund. Przestrzeni Górnego8.Śląska K-ce (maszynopis).9.Zarząd Gminy Goczałkowice-Zdrój 2000 Studium uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego gminy Goczałkowice-Zdrój CITEC S.A., Katowice Cz. III10.Bilnik A., Świercz T., Siudy A. 2004. Zbiornik Goczałkowicki wczoraj i dziś. Górnośląskie przedsiębiorstwo wodociągów w Katowicach,11.Brzeziński M., Romanowski J., Cygan J. P. and Pabin B. 1996. Otter Lutra lutra distribution in Poland. Acta Theriologica 41: 113-126,12.Cabała S. 2008. Raport z weryfikacji kompletności sieci Natura 2000 w województwie Śląskim. Wojewódzki zespół specjalistyczny województwa Śląskiego. Katowice,13.Herczek A. 2008. Raport z weryfikacji kompletności sieci Natura 2000 w województwie Śląskim. Wojewódzki zespół specjalistyczny województwa Śląskiego. Katowice,14.Kasza H. 1997. Dlaczego powinniśmy chronić Zbiornik Goczałkowicki Przyroda Górnego Śląska. 8: 12-13,15.Kondracki J. 2002. Geografia regionalna Polski. PWN, Warszawa,16.Kostorz L., Wieland Z., Konieczny W., Witkowska J. 2012. Goczałkowice-Zdrój. Opracowanie ekofizjograficzne (podstawowe). Biuro Rozwoju Regionu sp. z o.o. Katowice,17.Matuszkiewicz J.M. 2008. Potencjalna roślinność naturalna Polski, IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa,18.Romanowski J., Orłowska L., Zając T. 2011. Program ochrony wydry Lutra lutra w Polsce – projekt. Krajowa strategia gospodarowania wydrą. Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego. Warszawa.19.Klich S., Klich M., Firma Usługowa ECO-HELP, 2018, Rozpoznanie przyrodnicze w obszarze Natura 2000 Zbiornik Goczałkowicki – Ujście Wisły i Bajerki, Tarnów.20.Parusel J., 2019, materiały niepublikowane.21.Holeksa J. 2008. Raport z weryfikacji kompletności sieci Natura 2000 w województwie Śląskim. Wojewódzki zespół specjalistyczny województwa Śląskiego. Katowice. |
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
Back to top
No information provided
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
Back to top6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:
Organisation: | Regionalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska w Katowicach |
Address: | |
Email: | sekretariat.katowice@rdos.gov.pl |
6.2 Management Plan(s):
An actual management plan does exist:
|
Yes
| |
| No, but in preparation |
X | No |
6.3 Conservation measures (optional)
No information provided
7. MAP OF THE SITE
Back to topINSPIRE ID: | PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLH240039 |
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional) |
|
SITE DISPLAY