For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

• 1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
• 2. SITE LOCATION
• 3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
• 4. SITE DESCRIPTION
• 5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
• 6. SITE MANAGEMENT
• 7. MAP OF THE SITE

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

SE0820075

1.3 Site name

Reivo

1.4 First Compilation date

1995-10

1.5 Update date

2012-08

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:	Länsstyrelsen i Norrbottens län
Address:
Email:	norrbotten@lansstyrelsen.se

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site proposed as SCI:	1995-12
Date site confirmed as SCI:	2005-01
Date site designated as SAC:	2011-03
National legal reference of SAC designation:	Governmental act M2010/4648/Nm

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:	19.117700
Latitude:	65.815400

2.2 Area [ha]

9715.6000

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km] (optional):

No information provided

2.5 Administrative region code and name

No information provided

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Boreal

(100.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types						Site assessment
Code	PF	NP	Cover [ha]	Cave [number]	Data quality	A|B|C|D	A|B|C
						Representativity	Relative Surface	Conservation	Global
3110			107	0.00	M	B	C	B	B
3160			16.7	0.00	G	A	C	B	B
3260			10.3	0.00	G	B	C	B	B
4060			58.2	0.00	G	A	C	B	B
7140			178.9	0.00	G	A	C	A	B
7160			7.8	0.00	G	A	C	A	B
7230			0.3	0.00	G	A	C	A	B
7310			1006.5	0.00	G	A	C	A	A
8110			2	0.00	P	B	C	B	B
8210			5.1	0.00	P	B	C	B	B
8230			11.9	0.00	P	B	C	B	B
9010			7783.1	0.00	G	A	C	B	A
9060			90.7	0.00	M	A	C	A	B
91D0			10.9	0.00	M	A	C	A	B

• PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
• NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
• Cover: decimal values can be entered
• Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
• Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species					Population in the site						Site assessment
G	Code	Scientific Name	S	NP	T	Size		Unit	Cat.	D.qual.	A|B|C|D	A|B|C
						Min	Max				Pop.	Con.	Iso.	Glo.
I	1929	Aradus angularis			p				P	DD	A	B	B	B
P	1972	Ranunculus lapponicus			p				P	DD	C	A	C	C
I	1926	Stephanopachys linearis			p				P	DD	B	B	B	B
I	1927	Stephanopachys substriatus			p				P	DD	B	B	B	B

• Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
• S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
• NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
• Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
• Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
• Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
• Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

No information provided

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class	% Cover
N06	1.00
N07	13.00
N08	1.00
N17	85.00
Total Habitat Cover	100

Other Site Characteristics

The highest mountains are covered by alpine heath vegetation with surrounding precipices, long slopes, and a mosaic of forest and string bogs. There are also typical eskers. Highly variated in habitattypes and burningsuccessions.The relatively flat reserve has due to it's size many different types of foreststands and successions. More than a half consist of spruceforest of billberry-type. In some parts are the pinetrees the most dominant , but on some slopes are prominently mountainbirch forests well distributed. Wide areas unaffected by forestry with characteristics like overaged trees as well standing as lying dead wood resulting in high diversed entrichements of species.Some of the mires was in earlier times used for hay-making.The most spectacular with the reserve is the 300 ha large burningarea originated from 1966. 200 ha of the central part was totally burned and almost 100 % of the trees died. The burningfield is an interesting object for scientific studies on as well flora as the fauna linked to fires.Many red-listed, continuity-depending polypore- and lichen-species are found on the fallen logs indicating the high qualities of the reserve. Due to these mentioned values Reivo has also a well developed insectlife, depending on high abundanced supply of dead and dying trees.

4.2 Quality and importance

Reivo comprises one of the largest area of primeval, but fire-affected western taiga below the Swedish mountainrange, also including coniferous forests on glacifluvial eskers and alpine heaths. Belongs to one of the most valuable natural forestsite of the nation, with the nearly 10 000 ha large reserve unbroken and almost roadless. Other important species motivated :"other reason" are in general regionaly red-listed.

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

4.4 Ownership (optional)

No information provided

4.5 Documentation (optional)

Lovén, U., 1989, Naturinventering av Reivo Domänreservat, Rapport, Länsstyrelsen i Norrbootens län

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level (optional):

Code	Cover [%]
SE02	100.00

5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites (optional):

Designated at national or regional level:

Type code	Site name	Type	Cover [%]
SE02	Reivo	=	100.00

5.3 Site designation (optional)

No information provided

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:

Organisation:	Länsstyrelsen i Norrbottens län
Address:
Email:	norrbotten@lansstyrelsen.se

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

X	Yes	Name: Reivo Link: http://skyddadnatur.naturvardsverket.se/
	No, but in preparation
	No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

No information provided

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top

INSPIRE ID:	SE.SWEPA.SE0820075
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional)
Yes X No

---

SITE DISPLAY