NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM
For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
SITE | HUKN20012 |
---|
SITENAME | Szegedi ürgés gyep |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
Back to top1.1 Type
1.2 Site code
1.3 Site name
1.4 First Compilation date
1.5 Update date
1.6 Respondent:
Name/Organisation: | Kiskunsági National Park Directorate |
Address: |
|
Email: | |
1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates
Date site proposed as SCI: | 2004-05 |
Date site confirmed as SCI: |
No data
|
Date site designated as SAC: | 2010-02 |
National legal reference of SAC designation: | 275/2004. (X. 8.) Kormányrendelet |
2. SITE LOCATION
Back to top2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:
Longitude: | 20.092222 |
Latitude: | 46.245556 |
2.2 Area [ha]
2.3 Marine area [%]
2.4 Sitelength [km]:
2.5 Administrative region code and name
NUTS level 2 code
|
Region Name
|
---|
HU33 | Dél-Alföld |
2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Back to top3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them
Annex I Habitat types
|
Site assessment
|
---|
Code
|
PF
|
NP
|
Cover [ha]
|
Cave [number]
|
Data quality
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Representativity | Relative Surface | Conservation | Global |
---|
6260
|
|
| 148
| 0.00
| G
| B
| C
| B
| B
|
- PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
- NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
- Cover: decimal values can be entered
- Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)
3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
- Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
- Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)
3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)
- Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
- CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
- Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
- Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
Back to top4.1 General site character
Habitat class
|
% Cover
|
---|
N09 | 90.00 |
N15 | 8.00 |
N23 | 2.00 |
Total Habitat Cover | 100 |
---|
Other Site Characteristics
It is a plain grassland used as an airport (with grassy runways). Vegetation is seminatural, it is degraded to a medium degree owing to intensive mowing, trampling and drainage. It cannot be classified unambiguously in the European Union Habitat system (EUR15) because of degradation. "Other land" types are minor roads, airport buildings, canals, etc. |
4.2 Quality and importance
Kiemelt fontosságú cél a Spermophilus citellus (ürge) kedvező természetvédelmi helyzetének fenntartása.
It has good quality and great importance from the point of view of Spermophilus citellus population. This is the biggest population of the species between the rivers Danube and Tisza in the Great Hungarian Plain.
It has a lot of animal species protected by national law. |
4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site
The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site
Negative Impacts |
---|
Rank | Threats and pressures [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
H | A03.03 | | i |
H | A04.03 | | i |
M | D04.01 | | i |
M | E01 | | o |
M | F03.02.03 | | i |
H | J03.02 | | o |
H | K05.01 | | i |
Positive Impacts |
---|
Rank | Activities, management [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
H | A03 | | i |
Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both
4.5 Documentation
Relative abundancy of Spermophilus population is monitored in the framework of the National Biodiversity-monitoring System; there are annual reports about these surveys in the Kiskunság National Park Directorate.
The most detailed document about the state of the grassland is an evironmental impact study (10.2003) made in the framework of authorisation process of the development of the airport. The process is not closed yet, the nature conservation authority wants to harmonize the interests of Spermophilus conservation and airport development. |
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
Back to top5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:
5.3 Site designation (optional)
The site is not protected. |
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
Back to top6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:
Organisation: | Local authority of Szeged town. (Municipality of Szeged town of county rank.)
6720 Szeged, Széchenyi tér 10-11; mail@szegedvaros.hu; +36-62-564-364 |
Address: | |
Email: | |
6.2 Management Plan(s):
An actual management plan does exist:
|
Yes
| |
| No, but in preparation |
X | No |
6.3 Conservation measures (optional)
Általános célkitűzések: A Natura 2000 terület természetvédelmi célkitűzése az azon található, a kijelölés alapjául szolgáló fajok és élőhelytípusok kedvező természetvédelmi helyzetének megőrzése, fenntartása, helyreállítása, valamint a Natura 2000 területek lehatárolásának alapjául szolgáló természeti állapot és a kedvező természetvédelmi állapottal összhangban lévő gazdálkodás feltételeinek biztosítása.
Részletes célkitűzések:
A Spermophilus citellus (ürge) állománynagysága és állományának területi kiterjedése ne csökkenjen. Ennek érdekében élőhelyén biztosítani szükséges a rendszeres kaszálásos vagy legeltetéses gyepkezelést. A rendeltetésszerű és szükségszerű repülőtéri tevékenység körébe nem tartozó, az ürgeállományt megzavaró, illetve károsító tevékenységek ne történjenek a területen.
No management plan available. |
7. MAP OF THE SITE
Back to topINSPIRE ID: | HU.MA.HUKN20012 |
Map delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional) |
|
SITE DISPLAY