Database release:
SDF
NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

Back to top

1.1 Type

B

1.2 Site code

HUKN20021

1.3 Site name

Ökördi - erdőtelek - keceli lápok

1.4 First Compilation date

2003-11

1.5 Update date

2012-10

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:Kiskunsgi National Park Directorate
Address:               
Email:

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site proposed as SCI:2004-05
Date site confirmed as SCI: No data
Date site designated as SAC:2010-02
National legal reference of SAC designation:275/2004. (X. 8.) Kormnyrendelet

2. SITE LOCATION

Back to top

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:19.190000
Latitude:46.613056

2.2 Area [ha]

2517.8800

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code Region Name
HU33Dél-Alföld

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Pannonian (0.00 %) Pannonian (0.00 %) Pannonian (100.00 %)
Pannonian (100.00 %) Pannonian (100.00 %) Pannonian (100.00 %)
Pannonian (100.00 %) Pannonian (0.00 %) Pannonian (0.00 %)
Pannonian (0.00 %) Pannonian (0.00 %) Pannonian (0.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Back to top

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types Site assessment
Code PF NP Cover [ha] Cave [number] Data quality A|B|C|D A|B|C
      RepresentativityRelative SurfaceConservationGlobal
3150  info      0.00 
6410  info      25  0.00 
6440  info      227  0.00 
91E0  info      318  0.00 
  • PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
  • NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Cover: decimal values can be entered
  • Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species Population in the site Site assessment
G Code Scientific Name S NP T Size Unit Cat. D.qual. A|B|C|D A|B|C
      MinMax  Pop.Con.Iso.Glo.
A1188Bombina bombina         
P4081Cirsium brachycephalum    5001  10000   
F1149Cobitis taenia    251  500   
R1220Emys orbicularis         
M1355Lutra lutra               
I1060Lycaena dispar         
I1059Maculinea teleius    500  2000   
F1145Misgurnus fossilis    501  1000   
F1134Rhodeus sericeus amarus    101  250   
A1993Triturus dobrogicus         
F2011Umbra krameri    501  1000   
I1014Vertigo angustior         
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
  • Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
  • Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species

Population in the site

Motivation

Group CODE Scientific Name S NP Size Unit Cat. Species Annex Other categories
     MinMax C|R|V|PIVVABCD
Acrocephalus arundinaceus                   
Acrocephalus scirpaceus                   
Bufo bufo                   
Bufo viridis                   
Carex appropinquata                   
Centaurea sadleriana                   
Cephalanthera damasonium                   
Coturnix coturnix                   
Dactylorhiza incarnata                   
Dolomedes fimbriatus                   
Dryopteris carthusiana                   
Eleocharis uniglumis                   
Emberiza citrinella                   
Gampsocleis glabra                   
Hyla arborea                   
Iris spuria                   
Lacerta agilis                   
Lathyrus palustris                   
Limosa limosa                   
Listera ovata                   
Locustella fluviatilis                   
Locustella naevia                   
Mantis religiosa                   
Merops apiaster                   
Natrix natrix                   
Numenius arquata                   
Nymphaea alba                   
Orchis coriophora                   
Orchis laxiflora ssp. palustris                   
Ostrinia palustralis                   
Rana arvalis                   
Rhyparioides metelkanus                   
Samolus valerandi                   
Saxicola rubetra                   
Thelypteris palustris                   
Tringa totanus                   
Urtica kioviensis                   
Veratrum album                   
  • Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
  • CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
  • S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
  • NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
  • Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
  • Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
  • Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

Back to top

4.1 General site character

Habitat class % Cover
N039.00
N093.00
N1514.00
N202.00
N233.00
N1614.00
N0731.00
N1024.00

Total Habitat Cover

100

Other Site Characteristics

Large wetlands characterize the site with high biodiversity both on species and habitat levels. Unfortunately it has been exposed to intensive drainage, and until recently this was one of the most serious damaging effects (however its intensity has decreased already). Most important wetland habitats are: tussock and non-tussock sedge communities, reedbeds, Typha and Glyceria beds, alluvial meadows, Molinia meadows, euhydrophyte habitats, willows, willow-poplar woodlands. There are also ponds with open water. For the most part it was originally a treeless wetland (with natural woodlands on 3-5% of the site), now there are semi-natural, planted deciduous woodlands on 11% of the site. The greater part of salt marshes and salt steppes have developed secondarily (due to drainage).

4.2 Quality and importance

Kiemelt fontossg cl a kvetkezo fajok kedvezo termszetvdelmi helyzetnek fenntartsa: Triturus dobrogicus (dunai gote). Kiemelt fontossg cl a kvetkezo fajok/lohelyek kedvezo termszetvdelmi helyzetnek helyrelltsa: 3150 (termszetes eutrf tavak), 6410 (kkperjs rtek), 6440 (mocsrrtek), 91E0 (lperdok s puhafs ligeterdok), Lycaena dispar (nagy tuzlepke), Maculinea teleius (vrfu-boglrkalepke), Misgurnus fossilis (rti csk), Umbra krameri (lpi pc). It has good quality - in spite of drainage - and great importance, it is one of the most important wetlands between the Danube and Tisza rivers in the Great Hungarian Plain. It is a part of an important ecological corridor consisting of wetlands and passing from north to south. The role of the biggest canal (Dunavlgyi-focsatorna) - lying in the axis of the site - has partly changed by now the hydroecology of the wetland system: it has often swelled the water level (because of its irrigation function) and in these cases it can serve as a water source for the neighbouring wetland habitats. It has a lot of plant and animal species protected by national law.

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
RankThreats and pressures [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
HA03.01i
MA04.01i
LA04.03i
MA06i
MA07i
MA08i
MB01b
MB02i
LH01o
HI01b
MI02i
MJ01.01i
HJ02b
MJ03i
HK01i
MK02i
MK05i
MM01b
Positive Impacts
RankActivities, management [code]Pollution (optional) [code]inside/outside [i|o|b]
LA03i
LA04i

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.5 Documentation

There is a report prepared by a local NGO in 2000 - in Hungarian - about the state of natural values. The Kiskunsg National Park Directorate also performed a general study in the site in 1998.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

Back to top No data

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

Back to top

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

Yes
No, but in preparation
X
No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

ltalnos clkituzsek: A Natura 2000 terlet termszetvdelmi clkituzse az azon tallhat, a kijells alapjul szolgl fajok s lohelytpusok kedvezo termszetvdelmi helyzetnek megorzse, fenntartsa, helyrelltsa, valamint a Natura 2000 terletek lehatrolsnak alapjul szolgl termszeti llapot s a kedvezo termszetvdelmi llapottal sszhangban lvo gazdlkods feltteleinek biztostsa. Rszletes clkituzsek: A jello lohelyek kiterjedse ne cskkenjen, kivve ha ez a vltozs msik, az eltuno lohelyrszhez hasonl termszetessgu jello lohely kiterjedsnek nvekedse miatt kvetkezik be. A jello lohelyek termszetessge ne cskkenjen, kivve ha ez kzvetlenl elhrthatatlan klso ok (pldul idojrsi szlsosg, fogyasztszervezet gradcija), vagy erdei lohely esetn a fallomny engedlyezett vghasznlata miatt kvetkezik be. Erdei lohelyek megvand termszetes tulajdonsgai kz tartozik egyebek kztt a heterogn tr- s korszerkezet, a legyenglt egszsgu fk jelenlte, az ll s fekvo holtfk jelenlte, a fajgazdag cserje- s gyepszint. A tjidegen fafajok elegyarnya ne nvekedjen a jello erdei lohelyek llomnyaiban. A 91E0 (lperdo s puhafs ligeterdo) erdei lohely llomnyainak sszessgn a tjidegen fafajok elegyarnya felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt) legalbb 5%-al cskkenjen. A jello lohelyek invzis veszlyeztetsnek mrtke ne nvekedjen. Ennek rdekben a jello lohelyekkel rintkezo, az adott helyen tnyleges invzis fenyegetst jelento tjidegen fsszr llomnyok nem telepthetok. jonnan teleptett, vagy erdofeljts sorn ltestett tjidegen fsszr llomny s a jello lohelyek kztt legalbb 20 m szles vdoznt szksges kialaktani oshonos fsszr nvnyzetbol, vagy legalbb 30 m szles vdoznt lgyszr nvnyzetbol. A jello 91E0 erdei lohely tz ves felbonts korosztlyszerkezetben ne cskkenjen a trsgben szoksos erdogazdlkodsi gyakorlat szerint mr vghasznlatra elorhat korosztlyok, tovbb az oket eggyel megelozo korosztly sszestett terleti kiterjedse. Ne kerljn teht vghasznlatra tbb idos erdollomny, mint amennyi korosodsval belp a hasonl kolgiai funkcit elltni kpes korosztlyokba. A clkituzs megvalsulsa tz ves erdotervezsi ciklusonknt vizsgland. Erdotervezsi ciklusonknt 40%-os arnynl jobban ne cskkenjen vghasznlat rvn egyetlen korosztly terleti rszarnya sem. Azokon a jello erdei lohelyeken, amelyeken az erdollomny kpes feljulni a maga termszetes kolgiai folyamataira jellemzo mdon (termszetes sebessggel, llomnysurusggel, llomnyszerkezettel), ott biztostani szksges a termszetszeru feljtsok lehetosgt. Legyenek elhrtva az olyan, termszetszeru feljtsokat akadlyoz hatsok kzttk a tltartott nagyvadllomny kedvezotlen hatsa -, amelyek gyengtsnek s megszntetsnek technolgija ismert, s relisan kivitelezheto. A 91E0 (lperdok s puhafs ligeterdok) jello lohely termszetessge felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt), legalbb sszestett terletnek 10%-n nvekedjen, elsosorban az elegyedo tjidegen nvnyfajok irtsa s a termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyok helyrelltsa rvn. Trbeli kapcsolataik javtsa rdekben kiterjedsk felmrsi idoszakonknt legalbb 3%-al nvekedjen. Az erosebb vzhatst ignylo, javtand termszetvdelmi helyzetu gyepi lohelyek (6410 kkperjs rtek, 6440 mocsrrtek) kolgiai llapota, termszetessge tpusonknt kln vizsglva, felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt), legalbb az sszestett terletk 10%-n javuljon, elsosorban a termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyok helyrelltsa, a tjidegen invzis nvnyfajok irtsa, a szntterletekrol eredo zavar hatsok mrsklse s a gyepkezelsi gyakorlat javtsa gy a legeltetett llatok mennyisgnek, fajnak s fajtjnak optimalizlsa, a szksgtelen tiszttkaszlsok visszaszortsa, a mozaikos, hagysterletes kaszlsi gyakorlat s az lovilgot kmlo kaszlgptpusok terjesztse, a kaszlsi mdok diverzifiklsa rvn. A meglvo lohelyek kolgiai llapotnak, termszetessgnek javtsa kivlthat jello vizes lohelyek jonnan trtno kialaktsval, rekonstrukcijval is (a termszetessgnvelsi clkituzs teljes egszben a meglvo vizes lohelyek kiterjedsnek 10%-t kitevo rekonstrukcival helyettestheto). Az Alfld egyik legjelentosebb szak-dli irny kolgiai folyosjnak rszt kpezo terleten ne cskkenjen a jello lohelyek s fajok llomnyainak konnektivitsa. A 3150 (eutrf tavak) jello lohelyek termszetvdelmi helyzett javtani szksges, elsosorban a fokozott eutrofizci s a gyorsul feltltods elleni intzkedsekkel, a termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyok megorzsvel s helyrelltsval, a legalbb rszben nylt vzfelsznek megorzsvel, illetve helyrelltsval. A jello fajok llomnynagysga s llomnyainak terleti kiterjedse ne cskkenjen. A vonalas vziltestmnyek karbantartsa sorn pldul flszelvnyu kotrsok, vagy kotrs helyett hnrkaszls alkalmazsval, vagy kiszlestett s karbantarts nlkl marad refgium-blk kialaktsval, illetve a karbantarts idopontjnak megfelelo kivlasztsval - biztostani szksges a bennk elofordul jello fajok llomnyainak rdemi mrtku tllst. A vonalas vziltestmnyek clnak megfelelo vzkormnyzsval gy a vzhinyos idoszakokban vzmegorzssel - biztostani szksges a bennk elofordul jello fajok, gy a Bombina bombina (vrshas unka), Triturus dobrogicus (dunai gote), Emys orbicularis (mocsri teknos), Misgurnus fossilis (rti csk), Umbra krameri (lpi pc), Cobitis taenia (vgcsk), Rhodeus sericeus amarus (szivrvnyos kle) llomnyainak tllst, tovbb a jello vizes lohelyek termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyait. A Lycaena dispar (nagy tuzlepke) s a Maculinea teleius (vrfu-boglrka) llomnyainak mrett felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt) legalbb 10%-al nvelni szksges, elsosorban az lohelyeiken foly termszetvdelmi kezels kaszls s legeltets javtsval, az llomnyok trbeli kapcsolatainak javtsval, az lohelyek termszetes hidrolgiai viszonyainak helyrelltsval, az alkalmas lohelyek kiterjedsnek nvelsvel. A Misgurnus fossilis (rti csk) s Umbra krameri (lpi pc) llomnyainak termszetvdelmi helyzett javtani szksges, elsosorban a vonalas vziltestmnyek nem megfelelo karbantartsa s nem megfelelo vzkormnyzsa miatt bekvetkezo llomnypusztulsok mrsklsvel, valamint a tarts felszni vzbortsnak kitett lohelyek kiterjedsnek nvelsvel, illetve a tarts vzhats erossgnek nvelsvel. No management plan is available yet.

 

7. MAP OF THE SITE

Back to top No data

SITE DISPLAY