Database release:

SDF

NATURA 2000 - STANDARD DATA FORM

For Special Protection Areas (SPA),
Proposed Sites for Community Importance (pSCI),
Sites of Community Importance (SCI) and
for Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

SITE	HUKN20028
SITENAME	Tiszaalpár-bokrosi ártéri öblözet

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
2. SITE LOCATION
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
7. MAP OF THE SITE

1. SITE IDENTIFICATION

1.1 Type

1.2 Site code

HUKN20028

1.3 Site name

Tiszaalpár-bokrosi ártéri öblözet

1.4 First Compilation date

2003-12

1.5 Update date

2012-10

1.6 Respondent:

Name/Organisation:	Kiskunsgi National Park Directorate
Address:
Email:

1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates

Date site proposed as SCI:	2004-05
Date site confirmed as SCI:	No data
Date site designated as SAC:	2010-02
National legal reference of SAC designation:	275/2004. (X. 8.) Kormnyrendelet

2. SITE LOCATION

2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:

Longitude:	20.027222
Latitude:	46.817222

2.2 Area [ha]

3288.3300

2.3 Marine area [%]

0.0000

2.4 Sitelength [km]:

0.00

2.5 Administrative region code and name

NUTS level 2 code	Region Name
HU33	Dél-Alföld

2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)

Pannonian	(0.00 %)	Pannonian	(0.00 %)	Pannonian	(100.00 %)
Pannonian	(100.00 %)	Pannonian	(100.00 %)	Pannonian	(100.00 %)
Pannonian	(100.00 %)	Pannonian	(0.00 %)	Pannonian	(0.00 %)
Pannonian	(0.00 %)	Pannonian	(0.00 %)	Pannonian	(0.00 %)

3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

3.1 Habitat types present on the site and assessment for them

Annex I Habitat types						Site assessment
Code	PF	NP	Cover [ha]	Cave [number]	Data quality	A\|B\|C\|D	A\|B\|C
						Representativity	Relative Surface	Conservation	Global
3130			1	0.00	P	C	C	C	C
3150			132	0.00	G	A	C	B	B
6440			120	0.00	M	B	C	C	C
91E0			250	0.00	G	A	C	B	B
91F0			50	0.00	M	C	C	B	C

PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
Cover: decimal values can be entered
Caves: for habitat types 8310, 8330 (caves) enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation)

3.2 Species referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC and site evaluation for them

Species					Population in the site						Site assessment
G	Code	Scientific Name	S	NP	T	Size		Unit	Cat.	D.qual.	A\|B\|C\|D	A\|B\|C
						Min	Max				Pop.	Con.	Iso.	Glo.
I	4056	Anisus vorticulus			p				P	P	C	B	C	B
M	1308	Barbastella barbastellus			p	20	50	i		M	C	B	C	B
A	1188	Bombina bombina			p				C	P	C	B	C	B
P	2285	Colchicum arenarium			p	200	400	i		M	C	C	A	C
I	1086	Cucujus cinnaberinus			p				P	P	C	B	C	B
R	1220	Emys orbicularis			p	251	500	i		M	C	B	C	B
M	1355	Lutra lutra			p	15	25	i		M	C	B	C	B
F	1145	Misgurnus fossilis			p	10000	11000	i		M	C	B	B	B
M	1307	Myotis blythii			p	10	40	i		M	C	B	C	B
M	1318	Myotis dasycneme			p	101	250	i		M	C	B	C	B
M	1324	Myotis myotis			p				P	M	D
A	1993	Triturus dobrogicus			p				C	P	C	B	C	B
F	2011	Umbra krameri			p				P	P	C	C	A	C

Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
Type: p = permanent, r = reproducing, c = concentration, w = wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the Standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting (see reference portal)
Abundance categories (Cat.): C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present - to fill if data are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
Data quality: G = 'Good' (e.g. based on surveys); M = 'Moderate' (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = 'Poor' (e.g. rough estimation); VP = 'Very poor' (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)

3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna (optional)

Species					Population in the site				Motivation
Group	CODE	Scientific Name	S	NP	Size		Unit	Cat.	Species Annex		Other categories
					Min	Max		C\|R\|V\|P	IV	V	A	B	C	D
I		Acherontia atropos						R			X
I		Acrida hungarica						R			X
I		Aglais urticae						P			X
I		Apatura ilia						P			X
I		Archiearis puella						P			X
I		Arctia festiva						P			X
P		Astragalus contortuplicatus						R			X
A		Bufo bufo						C					X
A		Bufo viridis						C					X
I		Carabus cancellatus						P			X
I		Carabus clathratus						P			X
I		Carabus ullrichii						P			X
I		Catocala fraxini						P			X
P		Cicuta virosa						V			X
I		Copris lunaris						P			X
I		Dorcus parallelipipedus						P			X
I		Ennomos quercarius						P			X
I		Epitheca bimaculata						P			X
M		Eptesicus serotinus						C					X
M		Erinaceus concolor						R			X
I		Helix pomatia						C					X
P		Hottonia palustris						R			X
A		Hyla arborea						C					X
I		Inachis io						P			X
I		Iphiclides podalirius						P			X
R		Lacerta agilis						R					X
R		Lacerta viridis						R					X
P		Leucanthemum serotinum						R			X
P		Leucojum aestivum						R			X
P		Leucojum vernum						V			X
I		Megopis scabricornis						P			X
P		Menyanthes trifoliata						V			X
M		Myotis daubentoni						C					X
R		Natrix natrix						C					X
M		Nyctalus noctula						C					X
P		Nymphaea alba						C			X
I		Oberea euphorbiae						P			X
I		Odontognophos dumetatus						P			X
P		Ophioglossum vulgatum						V			X
P		Orchis laxiflora ssp. Palustris						R					X
I		Parnopes grandior						P			X
A		Pelobates fuscus						C					X
I		Periphanes delphinii						P			X
I		Phalera bucephaloides						P			X
M		Pipistrellus pipistrellus						C					X
A		Rana arvalis						C					X
A		Rana esculenta						C					X
A		Rana ridibunda						C					X
P		Salvinia natans						C			X
I		Saragosa porosa kenderiensis						P			X
P		Senecio paludosus						R			X
M		Sorex araneus						P					X
I		Staurophora celsia						P			X
M		Talpa europaea						R			X
P		Thelypteris palustris						C			X
P		Trapa natans						C					X
A		Triturus vulgaris						C					X
P		Urtica kioviensis						C			X
I		Vanessa atalanta						C			X

Group: A = Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P = Plants, R = Reptiles
CODE: for Birds, Annex IV and V species the code as provided in the reference portal should be used in addition to the scientific name
S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
Unit: i = individuals, p = pairs or other units according to the standard list of population units and codes in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting, (see reference portal)
Cat.: Abundance categories: C = common, R = rare, V = very rare, P = present
Motivation categories: IV, V: Annex Species (Habitats Directive), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons

4. SITE DESCRIPTION

4.1 General site character

Habitat class	% Cover
N06	6.00
N07	18.00
N09	1.00
N10	12.00
N15	38.00
N16	9.00
N20	12.00
N23	4.00
Total Habitat Cover	100

Other Site Characteristics

It is the largest remaining floodplain - falling between the main protective dike and the Tisza river - in the Middle- and Lower-Tisza-region in Hungary. It contains two bigger oxbow lakes (Szikrai-Holt-Tisza, Alpri-Holt-Tisza) with large open water surfaces and some lesser oxbows more silted up. All of these oxbows were formed by artificial cutoffs during the regulation of the river Tisza (started in the 19th century). The territory of the site is canalised, and protected from floods by a secondary dike which allows only floods above the average to come in, so unfortunately hydrographic functioning of habitats can be called at most semi-natural. The floodplain also gets large amounts of infiltrating ground water from the higher places of the Danube-Tisza Interfluvial Ridge, so it does not dry out even in years without inundation. There are high banks with steep slopes in certain parts along the western boundary of the site. Its most important wetland habitats are: non-tussock sedge communities, reedbeds, Typha and Glyceria beds, euhydrophyte habitats, alluvial willow-poplar forests, riparian mixed forests. There were extreme floods in 1999-2000, in these years a lot of arable lands have been abandoned and turned into marshes and ruderal habitats. "Other land" types are mainly wastes, minor roads, canals, dikes and some small farms on higher places.

4.2 Quality and importance

Kiemelt fontossg cl a kvetkezo lohelyek kedvezo termszetvdelmi helyzetnek fenntartsa: 3150 (termszetes eutrf tavak). Kiemelt fontossg cl a kvetkezo fajok/lohelyek kedvezo termszetvdelmi helyzetnek helyrelltsa: 6440 (mocsrrtek), 91E0 (lperdok s puhafs ligeterdok), 91F0 (kemnyfs ligeterdok), Myotis dasycneme (tavi denevr). It has high importance because it is the greatest remaining floodplain in the Middle- and Lower-Tisza-region in Hungary. Natural (not planted) willow-poplar alluvial forests are quite rare in these regions, and this applies also to riparian mixed forests with Quercus robur. Nevertheless the site contains valuable stands of both. It has medium quality. Most marshes are in a good natural state but spreading of adventive invasive Amorpha fruticosa can pose a threat even to them. In the past decades there were long periods without inundation (due to a secondary dike) and it was unfavourable for a lot of alluvial forest stands. Extreme floods of 1999-2000 have exterminated many alluvial meadows and most of the understorey in riparian mixed forests beacuse of very high and long-lasting water cover. (The secondary dike had also a role in these events because did not let the incoming water to leave the area in a natural way.) The invasion of agressive adventive plant species is also a very serious damaging factor, mainly for natural forests; the most important invasive species are: Amorpha fruticosa, Echinocystis lobata, Acer negundo, Vitis riparia, Fraxinus pennsylvanica.

4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site

The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site

Negative Impacts
Rank	Threats and pressures [code]	Pollution (optional) [code]	inside/outside [i\|o\|b]
M	A02		i
M	A03.01		i
H	A04.03		i
H	A06		i
M	A07		i
M	A08		i
M	B01		i
M	B02		i
M	E01		o
M	F02		i
M	G01		i
M	H01		b
H	I01		b
H	J02		b
M	J03		i
H	K01		i
M	K02		i

Positive Impacts
Rank	Activities, management [code]	Pollution (optional) [code]	inside/outside [i\|o\|b]
M	A03		i
H	A04		i
L	B02		i

Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both

4.5 Documentation

Plfai, I. (1995) (szerk.): Tisza-vlgyi holtgak. - Kzlekedsi, Hrkzlsi s Vzgyi Minisztrium, Budapest, 168 pp. S. Mahunka (ed.) (1986): The fauna of the Kiskunsg National Park. Vol.1. - Akadmiai Kiad, Budapest, 491 pp. S. Mahunka (ed.) (1987): The fauna of the Kiskunsg National Park. Vol.1. - Akadmiai Kiad, Budapest, 479 pp. L. Loks and M. Rajczy (eds) (1999): The flora of the Kiskunsg National Park.- Magyar Termszettudomnyi Mzeum, Budapest, 466 pp. Nagy, Sz. (1998): Fontos madrlohelyek Magyarorszgo. - Magyar Madrtani s Termszetvdelmi Egyeslet, Budapest, 138 pp. Sipos, F. (2001): A Nemzeti Biodiverzits-monitoroz Rendszer O5x5_046 Tiszaug/Tiszasas megnevezsu mintavteli kvadrtjnak lohely-trkpezse s lersa. Tth, K. (1979): Nemzeti Park a Kiskunsgban. Budapest: Natura. Tth, K. (1985): Tudomnyos kutatsok a Kiskunsgi Nemzeti Parkban 1975-1984 . Budapest: Hungexpo. Havranek, L. and Molnr, H. (1965): Preliminary report on the Arachnoidea-fauna of the Tisza-Valley Tiscia1:93-107. Havranek, L. (1962): Life of the river Tisza XX. Mammological investigations in "Tos"-forest. Acta Biol. Szeged. VIII (1-4):167-171. Havranek, L. (1961): Das Leben der Tisza XVI. Mammological investigations in the Tisza basin. Acta Biol. Szeged. VII(3-4):139-142. Horvth I., Margczi K: (1979): Region reconstruction of the Tisza dead-arm at Lakitelek on the basis of the ecological investigations performed in Toserdo.Tiscia 14:89-104. Ihrig, D. (1973) (szerk.): A magyar vzszablyozs trtnete.:--. Budapest, 398 pp Lszlffy, W. (1971): A Tiszavlgy vzrajzi kpe a szablyozsi munkk kszbn - .In: A Tisza szablyozsa I. rsz: 1846-1879. (eds. Botr, I., Krolyi, Z. ) pp.7-17. VIZDOK, Budapest. Marosi, S. - Szilrd J.: A tiszai Alfld. Budapest, 1969. 381 p. ko, R. (2000): A magyarorszgi folyk tltsezett szakaszn kialakult hullmterek terlethasznlatnak jellemzse. pp.339-341. Schreffel R. (1994): A holtgak szerepe a vzgazdlkodsban. In:Tisza-vlgyi holtgak rehabilitcis programja, Szeged, pp.7-12. Szcs, E. (1978): Vzkmiai vizsglatok a lakitelek-toserdoi holt-Tiszn, .pp.1-237. (manuscript) Vzgazdlkodsi Tudomnyos Kutat Intzet (1969 ) Vzrajzi Atlasz 7. Tisza. pp.288-323.VITUKI, Budapest. Vzrajzi Intzet (1931): A Tisza helysznrajza, hossz-szelvnye s keresztszelvnyei Tiszabecstol Szegedig, Budapest, pp.288-323. Kun Andrs (2009): A Tisza Alpr Bokrosi blzete /HUKN20028 kjtt. Natura 2000 terlet/ jello lohelyeinek feltrkpezse s kolgiai llapotfelvteleik elksztse; kutatsi jelents

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS

5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:

Code	Cover [%]
HU99	100.00

5.3 Site designation (optional)

The whole site is part of the "A Tisza homokhtsgi vzgyujtoje" Environmentally Sensitive Area. 25% of the site is part of the Kiskunsg National Park. Further 28% of the site is "Ex lege" Protected Bog. 15% of the area is designated as a CORINE Biotope site.

6. SITE MANAGEMENT

6.2 Management Plan(s):

An actual management plan does exist:

	Yes
	No, but in preparation
X	No

6.3 Conservation measures (optional)

ltalnos clkituzsek: A Natura 2000 terlet termszetvdelmi clkituzse az azon tallhat, a kijells alapjul szolgl fajok s lohelytpusok kedvezo termszetvdelmi helyzetnek megorzse, fenntartsa, helyrelltsa, valamint a Natura 2000 terletek lehatrolsnak alapjul szolgl termszeti llapot s a kedvezo termszetvdelmi llapottal sszhangban lvo gazdlkods feltteleinek biztostsa. Rszletes clkituzsek: A jello lohelyek kiterjedse ne cskkenjen, kivve ha ez a vltozs msik, az eltuno lohelyrszhez hasonl termszetessgu jello lohely kiterjedsnek nvekedse miatt kvetkezik be. A jello lohelyek termszetessge ne cskkenjen, kivve ha ez kzvetlenl elhrthatatlan klso ok (pldul idojrsi szlsosg, fogyasztszervezet gradcija), vagy erdei lohely esetn a fallomny engedlyezett vghasznlata, illetve a feljts rdekben szksgszeruen vgzett talajmunka miatt kvetkezik be. Erdei lohelyek megvand termszetes tulajdonsgai kz tartozik egyebek kztt a heterogn tr- s korszerkezet, a legyenglt egszsgu fk jelenlte, az ll s fekvo holtfk jelenlte, a fajgazdag cserje- s gyepszint. A tjidegen fafajok elegyarnya ne nvekedjen a jello erdei lohelyek egyik llomnyban sem. A 91E0 (lperdok s puhafs ligeterdok) jello lohely llomnyainak sszessgn a tjidegen fafajok elegyarnya felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt) legalbb 8%-al cskkenjen. A 91F0 (kemnyfs ligeterdok) jello lohely llomnyainak sszessgn a tjidegen fafajok elegyarnya felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt) legalbb 20%-al cskkenjen. A jello lohelyek invzis veszlyeztetsnek mrtke ne nvekedjen. Ennek rdekben a jello lohelyekkel kzvetlenl vagy az rvzi elntsek rvn kzvetetten rintkezo, az adott helyen tnyleges invzis fenyegetst jelento tjidegen fsszr llomnyok teleptse kerlendo. A 91E0 (lperdok s puhafs ligeterdok) s 91F0 (kemnyfs ligeterdok) jello lohelyek llomnyainak tz ves felbonts korosztlyszerkezetben ne cskkenjen a trsgben szoksos erdogazdlkodsi gyakorlat szerint mr vghasznlatra elorhat korosztlyok, tovbb az oket eggyel megelozo korosztly sszestett terleti kiterjedse. Ne kerljn teht vghasznlatra tbb idos erdollomny, mint amennyi korosodsval belp a hasonl kolgiai funkcit elltni kpes korosztlyokba. A clkituzs megvalsulsa tz ves erdotervezsi ciklusonknt vizsgland. Erdotervezsi ciklusonknt vghasznlat rvn a 91E0 (lperdok) egyetlen korosztlynak terleti rszarnya se cskkenjen 50%-os arnynl jobban, illetve a 91F0 (kemnyfs ligeterdok) egyetlen korosztlynak terleti rszarnya se cskkenjen 30%-ot meghalad mrtkben. Azokon a jello erdei lohelyeken, amelyeken az erdollomny kpes feljulni a maga termszetes kolgiai folyamataira jellemzo mdon (termszetes sebessggel, llomnysurusggel, llomnyszerkezettel), ott biztostani szksges a termszetszeru feljtsok lehetosgt. Legyenek elhrtva az olyan, termszetszeru feljtsokat akadlyoz hatsok, amelyek gyengtsnek s megszntetsnek technolgija ismert, s relisan kivitelezheto. A 91E0 (lperdok s puhafs ligeterdok) jello lohely termszetessge felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt), legalbb sszestett terletnek 8%-n nvekedjen, elsosorban az elegyedo tjidegen nvnyfajok irtsa s a termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyok helyrelltsa rvn. A 91F0 (kemnyfs ligeterdok) jello lohely termszetessge felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt), legalbb sszestett terletnek 15%-n nvekedjen, elsosorban az elegyedo tjidegen nvnyfajok mechanikus vagy legeltetses irtsa s a termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyok helyrelltsa rvn. A kedvezo termszetvdelmi helyzet helyrelltshoz clszeru az lohely legalbb egy rszt legeloerdoknt kezelni. A 6440 (mocsrrtek) jello lohely kolgiai llapota, termszetessge felmrsi idoszakonknt (hat venknt), legalbb sszestett terletnek 8%-n javuljon, elsosorban a termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyok helyrelltsa, a tjidegen invzis nvnyfajok irtsa, a szntterletekrol eredo zavar hatsok mrsklse s a gyepkezelsi gyakorlat javtsa gy a legeltetett llatok mennyisgnek, fajnak s fajtjnak optimalizlsa, a szksgtelen tiszttkaszlsok visszaszortsa, a mozaikos, hagysterletes kaszlsi gyakorlat s az lovilgot kmlo kaszlgptpusok terjesztse, a kaszlsi mdok diverzifiklsa rvn. A meglvo mocsrrtek kolgiai llapotnak, termszetessgnek javtsa kivlthat ugyanezen tpus lohelyek jonnan trtno kialaktsval, rekonstrukcijval is (a termszetessgnvelsi clkituzs teljes egszben a meglvo mocsrrtek kiterjedsnek 8%-t kitevo rekonstrukcival helyettestheto). A 3150 (termszetes eutrf tavak) jello lohely termszetvdelmi helyzetnek fenntartsa rdekben trekedni kell a tl intenzv eutrofizci, a gyors feltltods megelozsre, s gondoskodni szksges a termszetes vzhztartsi viszonyok, a nylt vzfelsznek megorzsrol. A jello fajok llomnynagysga s llomnyainak terleti kiterjedse ne cskkenjen. A Myotis dasycneme (tavi denevr) termszetvdelmi helyzett javtani szksges, elsosorban az alkalmas pihenohelyek (idos erdok, facsoportok s mestersges denevrszllsok) szmnak, illetve kiterjedsnek nvelsvel. There is a management plan of the site from 2000; its contents are incomplete and not according to the relevant national legislation; to be updated.

TABLE OF CONTENTS